Dental Publication / Article Details |
|
Biologic Interfaces in Esthetic Dentistry - Part II: The Peri-implant/Restorative Interface
Author(s):
Arndt Happe, Dr med dent, DDS; Gerd Körner, Dr med dent
Date Added:
3/27/2012
|
Summary:
Many factors have been proposed to interact with the peri-implant tissue, thus influencing long-term stability and esthetic outcome such as quality of periimplant tissue, implant abutment interface (microgap), material and design of implant abutment, and surgical and prosthetic procedures. Other factors are: presence of attached gingiva, type of provisional restorations, and oral hygiene procedures. The design of the implant–abutment interface is important because it is one of the primary determinants of prosthetic stability. The nature of this interface makes it sensitive to mechanical overloading and bacterial contamination, giving rise to many problems such as micromovements, loosening of abutment screws, and microbial colonization, which result in peri-implant inflammation and marginal bone resorption. Many designs of implant abutments, including interface, have been introduced in an attempt to overcome these problems.
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Influence of a Nanometer-Scale Surface Enhancement on De Novo Bone Formation on Titanium Implants
In this prospective randomized controlled clinical study, small titanium implants were placed in posterior maxillae for the purpose of assessing the rate and extent of new bone development. Nine pairs of site evaluation implants were placed in posterior areas of maxillae and retrieved with trephine drills after 4 or 8 weeks of unloaded healing. The amount of bone in linear contact (%) with the implant surface was used to determine the osteoconductive potential of the implant surface. Implant surfaces…
| Author(s): |
Tiziano Testori, MD, DDS, FICD;Ronnie J. Goene, DDS, Paolo Trisi, DDS, PhD |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical Distance from the Crest of Bone to the Height of the Interproximal Papilla Between Adjacent Implants
As patient demand increases for more natural restorations in the esthetic zone, clinicians must have the highest level of skill and knowledge to maintain or reform the interdental papilla between teeth, between implants and teeth, and between adjacent implants. To date, there are no reports that have measured the distance from the contact point to the bony crest between implants. One reason for this may be the fact that, with two adjacent implants, the contact point of the crown can be established at any distance from the gingival margin according to the restorative dentist's specifications. Therefore, in this study, the height of the soft tissue to the crest of bone was measured between two adjacent implants independent of the location of the contact point. The purpose of this study was to determine the range and average height of tissue between two adjacent implants.
| Author(s): |
David Garber, DMD;Maurice Salama, DMD;Henry Salama, DMD;Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS;Dr. Paul Fletcher, Dr. Stuart Froum, Dr. Ann Magner, Dr. Sang-Choon Cho |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Alveolar Ridge Regenerative Strategies: Autogenous Bone vs BMP-2
This clinical based presentation will compare the use of autogenous bone vs BMP-2 for alveolar ridge reconstruction. The science, indications, advantages and disadvantages of each approach will be featured. Single tooth to full arch reconstruction cases will also be shown along with understanding the application of non-resorbable vs resorbable mesh barriers for alveolar ridge reconstruction.
| Presented By: |
Michael A Pikos, DDS |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
The Central-Lateral Replacement Dilemma in Esthetic Implant Dentistry: Clinical Alternatives & Case Management
This presentation puts an emphasis on identifying the risk factors to successful esthetic outcomes specific to multiple adjacent tooth replacement within the Esthetic Zone. Specifically, the challenges to replacement of adjacent Maxillary Lateral and Central Incisors will be highlighted as well as developing appropriate solutions to overcoming them.
A clear blueprint will be outlined which will incorporate digital and biomaterial technology synergistically with advanced surgical protocols to overcome esthetic challenges and predictably achieve successful results. In addition, specific guidelines for the utilization of new regenerative products will be outlined as well as new technologies and applications for future enhancement.
| Presented By: |
Maurice Salama, DMD |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Prosthetic Strategies to Enhance Dental Implant Aesthetics
The principle focus of implant dentistry has changed significantly from the era of ‘Anatomically driven implant placement’ to the current practice of ‘Restoration driven implant placement’. When we now look at the failing dentition in the aesthetic zone we now must immediately consider conversion to implants. We are continually seeking greater control of the peri-implant tissues and ultimately the aesthetics of the restoration. Implant/abutment designs allow us to consider immediate implant replacement, and immediate non-functional loading especially in the aesthetic zone, where preservation of hard and soft tissue is of paramount importance in order follow the principles of aesthetics by maintaining the elements which are already there
| Presented By: |
E. Dwayne Karateew, DDS |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|