Dental Education
Online Dental Education Dental education lectures and videos Online dental ce Dental education articles Expert dental educators Dental products education Dental Community
 
Dental Publication / Article Details

Clinical Outcome of Submerged vs. Non-Submerged Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets Clinical Outcome of Submerged vs. Non-Submerged Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets

Author(s):

Luca Cordaro; Ferruccio Torsello; Mario Roccuzzo

Date Added:

8/8/2013


Summary:

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of submerged vs. nonsubmerged tapered implants placed into fresh extraction sockets. The results showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in the mean value of keratinized tissue (KT) height after surgery that was significantly reduced for submerged implants when compared with transmucosal implants. Similar outcomes were found for submerged and non-submerged implants placed in fresh extraction sockets with a horizontal peri-implant defect smaller than 2mm, except for a reduction of KT in the submerged group. Either with a submerged or a nonsubmerged procedure, 1mm of mean soft tissue recession is seen after 1 year when compared with the pre-extraction situation.

Related Articles
Immediate Implant Placement into Extraction Sockets with Labial Plate Dehiscence Defects: A Clinical Case Series

Immediate Implant Placement into Extraction Sockets with Labial Plate Dehiscence Defects: A Clinical Case Series
To measure the buccal plate reconstruction of extraction sockets with labial plate dehiscence defects using a bone allograft in combination with an absorbable collagen membrane and a custom-healing abutment at the time of tooth removal. Implants placed into sockets with labial plate dehiscence defects demonstrated radiographic reformation of the labial plate dehiscence defect at 6 to 9 months post-treatment. The net gain in labial plate on CBCT in L1 and L2 was 3.0 mm, where 0 mm existed at pre-treatment. The minimum amount of labial plate thickness of 2.0 mm was achieved in all treated sites, evaluated radiographically at 6-9 months post-operatively, in a single procedure, without flap elevation and maintaining the gingival architecture and satisfactory esthetics.

Author(s): Stephen J. Chu, DMD, MSD, CDT;Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS;Guido O. Sarnachiaro, DDS; Evangelina Sarnachiaro, DDS; Sergio Luis Gotta, DDS
View Article>>
Periodontally Considerations of Dental Implantology

Periodontally Considerations of Dental Implantology
<p>The endosseous dental implant has steadily progressed to become an important modality of restoring incomplete dentitions in either fully or partially edentulous patients. Osseointegrated dental implants have demonstrated relatively high success rates in both the maxillary and the mandibular jaws. The American Academy of Implant Dentistry (AAID), the American Dental Association (ADA), and numerous other professional organizations have endorsed the placement of osseointegrated dental implants as…

Author(s): Lee H. Silverstein, DDS, MS, FACD, FICD;Jerry J. Garnick , David Kurtzman, DDS, Peter C. Shatz
View Article>>
Sinus Floor Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement In Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Sinus Floor Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement In Severely Atrophic Maxilla
DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT ASSOCIATED augmentation of the sinus floor in the severely atrophic maxilla can be performed in 1- or 2 surgical stages depending on the height of the residual alveolar bone.

Author(s): Ziv Mazor, DMD;Michael Peleg, DMD;Gravriel Chaushu, Arun K. Garg
View Article>>
Related Videos
Dr. Ziv Mazor on Implant Dentistry Premium Member Content

Dr. Ziv Mazor on Implant Dentistry
Dr. Ziv Mazor discusses many of the different aspects of implantology.

Presented By:: Ziv Mazor, DMD;Jack T. Krauser, DMD;Jack T. Krauser, DMD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Full Arch Implant Dentistry Utilizing the Easy Guide System (FAST Guide) Premium Member Content

Full Arch Implant Dentistry Utilizing the Easy Guide System (FAST Guide)
In immediate loading, the survival rate is often based on the follow-up of the osseointegration but without aesthetic appreciation. The main goal is to achieve osseointegration and aesthetic with long term stability. For this success, we need to obtain both, bone formation and gum thickness, as any failure in one of the 2 factors will induce the loss of the second factor. Several requirements must be met in order to obtain and to maintain them together for a very long time; -Biological requirements are linked to early vascularization (appreciation of the biologic level, growth factors, collagen environment) -Anatomical and surgical requirements will help for the best implant placement and positioning (fast guide, sub-crestal insertion, platform switching etc...) -Prosthetic requirements are essential for aesthetic as guidance for soft tissue design (rigid and screwed prvisional prosthesis)

Presented By:: Alain Simonpieri, DDS
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
One-Piece Unibody Implant Replacement Premium Member Content

One-Piece Unibody Implant Replacement
Utilization of a one-piece Zimmer Unibody Implant.

Presented By:: Maurice Salama, DMD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Related Courses
Immediate Loading in Implant Dentistry - Coherent Clinical Application in Everyday Practice Premium Member Content

Immediate Loading in Implant Dentistry - Coherent Clinical Application in Everyday Practice
Dr. Henry Salama will outline clinical protocols to facilitate efficient, successful and predictable application of immediate loading protocols for single unit replacement as well as fully edendulous patients.

Presented By:: Henry Salama, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2 Premium Member Content

Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2
Missing soft tissue is the main reason for compromised results in the aesthetic zone. But since the soft tissue has to be supported by a sufficient amount of bone, our focus has also to be on bone. Due to the fact that no bone-preservation technique (at the time of tooth extraction) available today, gives us the perfect result we need, augmentation procedures are still needed. Appropriate bone and soft tissue engineering in all three dimensions enhances the aesthetic performance of long-lasting restorations that blend in well and emerge from the periimplant sulcus in harmony with the neighboring teeth.

Presented By:: Ueli Grunder, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU)
Watch Now>>
Partners in Synergy - The Webinar Event; Augmentation Strategies in Implant Dentistry Premium Member Content

Partners in Synergy - The Webinar Event; Augmentation Strategies in Implant Dentistry
This course will highlight the current available regenerative techniques and protocols to maximize the esthetic results of tooth replacement therapy. Extraction site management, labial bone enhancement as well as current gingival augmentation techniques will be featured. These highly acclaimed clinicians and educators will team up to provide a glimpse of their upcoming LIVE Synergy VI conference June 11th - 14th, 2015 in Orlando, Florida.

Presented By:: Maurice Salama, DMD;Michael A Pikos, DDS
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Download Now

Important!

To view this dental publication or article, you must be a registered user of Dental XP. If you are already a member, click here to login.

Registration is free and only takes several minutes. Dental XP will never spam you, or sell your information.

Join For Free





Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©2019

Preferred Language: English Flag
Contact Us · Login · Register