Video Details
|
Making Successful Clinical Decisions in Esthetic Implant Therapy - Part 3 of 3
Description:
Implant supported restorations that blend in optimally with the natural dentition are now the standard that our patients demand and expect. Our ability to provide such a service predictably is dependent on our diagnostic ability as well as our therapeutic treatment design. The durability of our results, however, especially as they relate to soft-tissue esthetics, are often effected by the implant and abutment design. This presentation will outline a systematic diagnostic and treatment design protocol for anterior implant supported restorations as well as how implant design, components and regenerative techniques influence the process.
Date Added:
2/20/2011
Author(s):
Henry Salama, DMD
[ read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Making Successful Clinical Decisions in Esthetic Implant Therapy - Part 3 of 3
Questions & Comments
|
Maurice Salama - (9/29/2014 10:24 AM)
Great 3 part series on Esthetic Implant Therapy. A detailed view of critical aspects to avoid failure. Dr. Salama
|
Mohammad Khandaqji - (9/28/2014 3:14 PM)
Thank you .
|
DR.AYMAN SAKER960 - (1/8/2013 3:11 AM)
Thank you so much ... I just loved your presentation and happy new year :)
|
Maurice Salama - (9/14/2012 11:39 AM)
Excellent lecture series here by my brother Dr. Henry Salama on Decision Making and Tx in Esthetic Implant Dentistry. Is well worth the time.
|
henry salama - (12/21/2011 12:59 PM)
Hi Ronald, a 3.5 Ankylos would do well in these circumstance, especially because of the platform switch type of feature which effectively increases the distance between the adjacent teeth and the implant/abutment junction. A 3.0 one-piece Zimmer TSV would also work well because there would be no implant/abutment junction. Either way, however, the most important factor in these cases is the accuracy of the implant placement because there is no margin for error. Therefore, a CBCT guided implant protocol with a surgical guide etc. is highly useful.
|
ronald shoha85 - (12/20/2011 10:18 PM)
I have a case with two congenitally missing laterals.There is only 4.5 mm of space between the cuspids and the centrals. Do you feel an Ankylos (3.5mm) are too wide to place here? Dr Ron Shoha rshoha@gmail.com
|
Paul Kozy DDS - (2/27/2011 2:16 PM)
Very nice presentation, Henry. The best as always.
|
Related Videos |
|
|
|
|
Jaw Bioengeneering
A new concept to replace bone utilizing jaw bioengineering.
Presented By:: |
Mohamed Sharawy, B.D.S., Ph.D. |
Presentation Style: |
Lecture |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical Bone Augmentation Using a Tunnel Approach Step by Step - Part 2 of 2
Bone atrophies are one of the most challenging situations in modern implantology. Several techniques have been proposed to be able to place implants in those atrophic situations. This first presentation will show step by step the Split Bone block technique as described by Dr. Khoury to perform horizontal bone augmentation procedures. Bone biology is also explain in order to understand why this technique offer us some great advantages. The second presentation will focus of vertical bone augmentation procedures using this same technique but through a tunnel approach. The advantages of this approach will also be described in this presentation.
Presented By:: |
Jose L. Dominuez-Mompell, DDS, MsC;Juan Lara Chao, DDS, MsC |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Bone Reconstruction: A New Algorithm for the Implantologist
Bone augmentation is often required to place an adequate number of dental implants in ideal positions for prosthetic support. In addition to biomechanical demands bone augmentation can also provide proper ridge contour for improved esthetic outcomes. Disadvantages of bone augmentation techniques include increase morbidity, surgical time, costs and treatment length. As such a trend has develop towards treatment approaches that avoid bone grafting including shorter and narrower implants, angled implants and/or fewer implants for prosthetic support. This presentation will look at various bone augmentation techniques, methods to minimize the morbidity of bone grafting and guide clinicians on implant rehabilitation with grafting versus non-grafting approaches.
Presented By:: |
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Fibrin-Guided Bone Regeneration: Guidelines of a Simple, Predictable, & Low Risk Technique
This lecture is focused on an effective regenerative approach, but at low knowledge. The goal is to provide a new skill in favor of well-established techniques. The Fibrin Sealant (FS) is an additional clot of human origin. It has adhesive, sealant and inductive action stimulating hard and soft-tissue regeneration. The FS, mixed with bone chips and biomaterials, allows a better handling of the graft that, becoming plastic and moldable, adapts perfectly to bony defects without dispersion of granules. It’s effective also on wound protection achieving a faster healing of soft-tissue. This approach is excellent in the socket preservation and in the peri-implant regeneration on "closed" sites where the implants are inside the defects.
Presented By:: |
Vincenzo Foti, MD, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Credit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Bone Graft Cements: A New Advance to Augmentation Solutions
The purpose of this lecture is to shed light on the evolution of raw materials in order to find the ultimate bone graft cement, exploring the potential and the new opportunities of using cement-based augmentation materials in the maxillofacial and dental fields, and emphasizing the advantages, disadvantages and methods of use from the scientific and clinical points of view.
Presented By:: |
Amos Yahav, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Credit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Mandibular Block Autografts for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
This article reviews indications, limitations, presurgical evaluation, surgical protocol, and complications associated with mandibular block autografts harvested from the symphysis and ramus buccal shelf for alveolar ridge augmentation. The author draws from 14 years of experience with more than 500 mandibular block autografts.
|
|
|
|
Intraoral Autogenous Block Onlay Bone Grafting for ExtensiveReconstruction of Atrophic Maxillary Alveolar Ridges
Autologous bone grafting used with dental implants was originally described by Bränemarketal in 1975, and is now a well-accepted procedure in oral and maxillofacial rehabilitation.Placement of an endosseous implant requires sufficient bone volume for complete bone coverage. Furthermore, the pattern of ridge resorption contributes to an unfavorable maxillomandibular relationship, requires angulations of the implants and/or angled abutments, and affects the proximity of adjacent facial concavities(maxillary sinus, nasal cavity) and vital structures(mandibular nerve).
|
|
|
|
|