Dental Education
Online Dental Education Dental education lectures and videos Online dental ce Dental education articles Expert dental educators Dental products education Dental Community
 
Video Details
Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface

Description:
Emerging concepts in implant dentistry have allowed bone preservation to become a reality, thus reducing the need for extensive augmentation procedures. Nevertheless, clinicians are still confronted with atrophic defects that require complex regenerative strategies for dental implant rehabilitation. This presentation will focus on some of the essential elements for a predictable regenerative protocol in implant site development. A discussion will include the use of defect topography as a guide in choosing a suitable augmentation technique. Several considerations that allow for tension free wound closure will be reviewed. Furthermore, an evidence based approach in graft material selection will be presented. Clinical cases will then be reviewed, to demonstrate how to integrate the presented principles into daily clinical practice.

Date Added:
6/29/2016

Author(s):

Ehab Moussa, DDS Ehab Moussa, DDS
Dr Ehab Moussa graduated with a bachelors degree of dental surgery (BDS) in 2009 from faculty of dentistry, Alexandria university, Egypt. He then completed a ...
[read more]




Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface




Questions & Comments
Ehab Moussa - (9/2/2016 8:21 PM)

Thank you dear Figen.

FİGEN ÖZÇELEBİ - (8/15/2016 10:21 AM)

One of the best presentations I have seen Dr Moussa thank you

Robin Tran - (7/12/2016 11:27 AM)

Dr Moussa,
thank you very much for your reply.
RT

Ehab Moussa - (7/11/2016 11:45 PM)

Snjezana, I am honored you enjoyed the presentation. I am sure with your outstanding skills, you will achieve great results with Ti mesh !! Best regards, Ehab

Ehab Moussa - (7/11/2016 11:43 PM)

Dear Dr Tran, Thank you for your kind comment. I have seen your post in the forum. Obviously having some clinical photographs would help more, however these are my thoughts. Patient 1: It appears as though the implant might not be deep enough. If you are set on keeping the implant in place, you can attempt submerging the implant with a rotated palatal pedicle and then uncovering after soft tissue has been augmented, don't think bone grafting will be much help here. Again, very difficult to tell without clinical photographs. If the entire implant surface is exposed 360 degrees all around through the gingiva, I would remove the implant and start all over. The fact that you are faced with a tissue deficiency and implant exposure (even if just on the buccal aspect), still compels me to remove the implant. Perhaps removal, followed by soft and hard tissue augmentation and implant placement would be most predictable for the long term. I would not recommend any bone augmentation if soft tissue quality is poor. Case 2: Perhaps bone augmentation with delayed implant placement would be a predictable plan. The sausage technique with a collagen membrane seems like a good alternative here. Non resorbable barriers and Ti-mesh would also work well, however do have a higher chance of complications and may not be needed (Again difficult to tell just from scans). Difficult to determine whether simultaneous implant placement is possible here, it appears as though the ridge has also a large buccal concavity. Personally I do not disturb the pseudoperiosteum layer. However I measure the thickness, and attempt to place my implants 1-2mm subcrestal to account for any future remodeling that may occur. Perhaps adding some clinical images and posting the case in the forum will allow you to also get extremely valuable input from the members. I do this quiet often, and it has SAVED me several times. I do hope that this helps, and I thank you for your kind interest. Best regards, Ehab

Robin Tran - (7/11/2016 3:55 AM)

Dr, you mentioned , upon removing titanium membrane, there was a layer of pseudoperiotium . should I scrape it off before placing implant. thanks RT

Robin Tran - (7/11/2016 3:26 AM)

Dr Moussa:Ifind this video very informative. I need your advice on 2 cases: 1st case. 29 yo male heavy smoker,healthy individual.he stopped smooking cold turkey when #8 was extracted and implant was placed. bone graft and membrane was placed right after. 1 week later, bone graft failed due to smoking again. I removed the graft, cleaned with saline and tetracycline powder, placed new graft again(using nonresorbable PTFE membrane without primary closure) and left implant in tag. Area healed, but buccal surface bone loss is significantly and about 1mm of implant is showed above gum. I have to go in and graft again. I wont be able to get primary closure even full flap is lifted up high due to small area of mucosa. I am using Hiossen. Should i: 1. use titanium membrane with PTFE nonresorbable membrane on the outside 2. leave the area with PTFE see through.
What kind and brand of titamium membrane are you using? what tools did you use to cut titanium membrane and to tag the screws in?
2. 2nd case: 50 yo male, smoker and healthy. He stopped smooking 2months before procedure. He had a bridge 9to 11. #11 had cavity and unrestorabe. I did removed #11 and grafted bone on #10 and #11 using nonresorbable memebrane PTFE without primary closure. #9 has temporary. My plan is to place implant on #11 later and canteliver #10 from #11 because spaces 10 and 11 is about 9mm only. this guy have issues: a. scar tissue(?) around 10 and 11 to the upper inside lip is hard and immobile.It's been like this for years. b. bone graft at alveolar crest is around 4 to 5mm at most. How can I overcome placing implant and graft more bone from here. I will find ways to post ctscans ad xrays. thank you. RT. Please look for my scans and xrays under implant dental forum Attn Dr Moussa. thank you

snjezana pohl - (7/10/2016 3:09 PM)

Thank you for very informative and didactically well structured presentation! Literature overview and results with Ti mesh are really encouraging,you convinced me to try it. Best regards Snjezana

Ehab Moussa - (7/8/2016 5:38 PM)

Dear Dr Mirna; Thank you for your kind comment. Really the key for adequate primary closure is RELEASE OF THE FLAPS. For the labial flap I use a sharp 15 or 15c blade for a periosteal scoring incision preferably apical to the MGJ. The incision does not have to be very deep, just has to be continuos from one end of the flap to the other. Following that, depending on the amount of release required, I can go back and deepen the incision with a blade. Releasing the lingual flap really simplifies the closure so much, and increases our chances of maintaining a closed healing environment (same technique as described in presentation). For the palatal flap, adequate reflection in both a mesio-distal and apico-coronal dimension is essential for double layer closure. As for the closure, I use deep horizontal mattress sutures about 4-5 mm from the flap margin on both labial and lingual flaps, this increases the area of CT contact between both flaps. Then a continuos interlocking or interrupted sutures to approximate the flap margins together. I hope this helps. Best regards, Ehab

Related Videos
Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation: Optimizing Esthetic Results for the Restorative Dentist Premium Member Content

Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation: Optimizing Esthetic Results for the Restorative Dentist
Contemporary patient expectations have made esthetics a major requisite of all treatment plans, especially in situations where there is a high smile line. Although new restorative materials have highly improved predictability and esthetic outcomes, soft and hard tissue management play a fundamental role when working in esthetic areas. To achieve ideal esthetics, preservation of the natural soft and hard tissue architecture is a primary clinical objective. These new proposed techniques illustrate the importance of pre-prosthetic soft and hard tissue management when working in highly esthetic compromised areas.

Presented By:: Giuseppe Cicero, DDS
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Guided Bone Regeneration of a Compromised Extraction Site Premium Member Content

Guided Bone Regeneration of a Compromised Extraction Site
Dr. Michael Sonick shares a routine clinical challenge and demonstrates the extraction of a fractured premolar with simultaneous guided bone regeneration.

Presented By:: Michael Sonick, DMD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Preservation of the Bundle Bone: Reality or Myth Premium Member Content

Preservation of the Bundle Bone: Reality or Myth
The loss of teeth will lead to resorption of the buccal plate with its resultant need for extensive augmentative procedures (both bone and soft tissue) as well as the risk of poor long term aesthetic stability. Partial Extraction Therapies (PET) are techniques that allow us to maintain the buccal bone plate and hence prevent the collapse of the alveolar bone creating a platform for ideal soft tissue and bone which is stable in the long term. This is a greater problem in the aesthetic areas. This lecture will take you through the different options with regards to immediate implant placement as well as the most cutting edge PET in a step by step fashion.

Presented By:: Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Related Courses
Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface Premium Member Content

Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface
Emerging concepts in implant dentistry have allowed bone preservation to become a reality, thus reducing the need for extensive augmentation procedures. Nevertheless, clinicians are still confronted with atrophic defects that require complex regenerative strategies for dental implant rehabilitation. This presentation will focus on some of the essential elements for a predictable regenerative protocol in implant site development. A discussion will include the use of defect topography as a guide in choosing a suitable augmentation technique. Several considerations that allow for tension free wound closure will be reviewed. Furthermore, an evidence based approach in graft material selection will be presented. Clinical cases will then be reviewed, to demonstrate how to integrate the presented principles into daily clinical practice.

Presented By:: Ehab Moussa, DDS
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Optimum Implant Esthetics Through Extraction Socket Preservation Techniques Premium Member Content

Optimum Implant Esthetics Through Extraction Socket Preservation Techniques
This presentation will focus on ideal implant placement through maintaining the bucco-lingual dimension of bone following extraction through extraction socket preservation techniques.

Presented By:: Mario A. Vilardi, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Creative Next Generation Surgical Tools and Solutions for the Implant Practice Premium Member Content

Creative Next Generation Surgical Tools and Solutions for the Implant Practice
Modern Bone Grafting has become more predictable than ever before. Recent developments in CBCT 3D Diagnosis and the utilization of bioactive modifiers such as PRGF, PRF and BMP-2 have stimulated further advances in surgical techniques as well as a New Age Surgical Armamentarium to maximize the efficiencies and success of these sophisticated procedures.

Presented By:: Maurice Salama, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
SGFBR (Screw Guided Fast Bone Regeneration) Horizontal & Vertical Bone Augmentation of the Atrophic Mandible Premium Member Content

SGFBR (Screw Guided Fast Bone Regeneration) Horizontal & Vertical Bone Augmentation of the Atrophic Mandible
This presentation will highlight a less invasive surgical option to autogenous block transplantation and has displayed a very high success rate.

Presented By:: Roland Török, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Related Articles
The Mandibular Retromolar Area as a Donor Site in Maxillofacial Bone Grafting - Surgical Notes

The Mandibular Retromolar Area as a Donor Site in Maxillofacial Bone Grafting - Surgical Notes
The objective of this article is to review pertinent surgical notes related to the safe harvesting of corticocancellous bone blocks from the retromolar area using a trephine bur technique.

Author(s): Ali Fakhry, DMD, MS
View Article>>
Minimally Invasive Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Procedure (Tunneling Technique) Using rhPDGF-BB in Combination with Three Matrices: A Case Series

Minimally Invasive Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Procedure (Tunneling Technique) Using rhPDGF-BB in Combination with Three Matrices: A Case Series
This study investigated a minimally invasive surgical procedure for alveolar ridge augmentation that combined recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB (rhPDGF-BB) and three different matrices.

Author(s): Myron Nevins, DDS;Marc L. Nevins, DMD, MMSc; Marcelo Camelo, DDS; Peter Schupbach, PhD; Bernard Friedland, BChD, MSc, JD; Joao Marcelo Borges Camelo, DDS; David M. Kim, DDS, DMSc
View Article>>
Reconstruction of Damaged Fresh Sockets by Connective-Bone Sliver Graft From the Maxillary Tuberosity, to Enable Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration - A Clinical Case

Reconstruction of Damaged Fresh Sockets by Connective-Bone Sliver Graft From the Maxillary Tuberosity, to Enable Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration - A Clinical Case
This paper describes a procedure for immediate loading of an implant following tooth extraction, in a socket presenting severe damage to the vestibular bone plate and gingival recession in the region of the upper central incisors. The procedures of extraction of the tooth, immediate insertion of the implant, connective- bone graft from the maxillary tuberosity and immediate restoration were shown to be a predictable treatment alternative. These procedures led to restoration of the tooth, bone and gingival structures in a single surgical stage and to maintenance of the favorable esthetic and functional result 24 months afterwards.

Author(s): José Carlos Martins da Rosa, DDS, MS;Darcymar Martins da Rosa; Carla Mônica Zardo; Ariádene Cristina Pértile de Oliveira Rosa; Luigi Canullo
View Article>>
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©2018

Preferred Language: English Flag
Contact Us · Login · Register