Video Details
|
Ridge Splitting and/or GBR - Maxilla vs. Mandible - Part 1 of 2
Description:
Mandibular ridge splitting has been a clinical challenge due to high density of cortical bone. Therefore, some clinicians recommends two stage approach to overcome this issue. We will also present an unique ridge splitting technique that is easy to do and predictable using one stage approach.
Date Added:
7/9/2012
Author(s):
Samuel Lee, DDS
Dr. Samuel Lee is a Diplomate of American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry. Currently, Dr. Samuel Lee is attending Harvard School of Dental Medici...
[read more]
|
|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Ridge Splitting and/or GBR - Maxilla vs. Mandible - Part 1 of 2
|
Questions & Comments
|
John Carpenter - (9/2/2012 6:25 PM)
Excellent video! I have always split the maxilla and spread with osteotomes. This video removed a few barriers I had to splitting the mandible.
|
Andres Freixas - (8/10/2012 2:29 PM)
Dear dr Lee where its the continue of this great lecture? regards Andres Paraud
|
omid moghaddas - (7/29/2012 12:39 AM)
Tnx.Dear Dr Lee ,is it more predictable to do ridge splitting in mandible when we have broad base comparing to have parallel walls from crestal area to the apical?when you do the horizontal osteotomy ,the depth of should be similar to the height of the implant or more than that?will you do ridge splitting in posterior mandible with parallel walls and 3mm thickness or you prefer to do GBR or block grafts in these cases to reduce the risk of fracture?thanks again .
|
samuel lee - (7/28/2012 9:41 PM)
Dear Dr. Omid,
thanks for watching the video! You are right that maxilla is more spongious and easier to split. But, due to concavity of apical region on pre maxilla, the angulation of implant becomes too buccal. Therefore, I recommend GBR on pre maxilla over ridge splitting. However, mandibular ridge is lingually inclined by 20 degree, so implant angulation is more favorable after ridge split. Thanks
|
omid moghaddas - (7/25/2012 2:40 PM)
i am agree in some part that ridge splitting is more predictable in mandible,but on the other hand ,there is more sponinuous bone available in maxilla so it can be more easily condensed with less risk of facture during spltting.please tell me if this belif is right.thanks so much for this perfect and comprehensive presentation Dr Lee
|
seyed ali mosalla nezhad - (7/23/2012 9:53 AM)
excellent video
|
Paul Scholl - (7/14/2012 6:40 PM)
Nice presentation with new technology.
|
Ronni Deniger - (7/11/2012 3:59 PM)
Excellent Video, Thanks!
|
Related Videos |
|
|
Ridge Splitting and/or GBR - Maxilla vs. Mandible - Part 2 of 2
Mandibular ridge splitting has been a clinical challenge due to high density of cortical bone. Therefore, some clinicians recommends two stage approach to overcome this issue. We will also present a unique ridge splitting technique that is easy to do and predictable using one stage approach.
| Presented By: |
Samuel Lee, DDS |
| Presentation Style: |
Video |
| Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
BMP, PRP, PRGF and PRF; At the Edge of Regenerative Surgery
This webinar will review the wound healing process and the role that growth factors play in regeneration. BMP, PRP, PRF and PRGF will be reviewed and their clinical applications will be demonstrated.
| Presented By: |
Avi Schetritt, DMD |
| Presentation Style: |
Lecture |
| Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Vertical Bone Augmentation: Current Concepts and Techniques
This lecture will review several approaches used for vertical bone augmentation and discuss the benefits and limitations of each. There will be special emphasis on the titanium mesh and interpositional osteotomy techniques.
| Presented By: |
David Dara Yarmand, DDS, MD |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alveolar Ridge Regenerative Strategies: Autogenous Bone vs BMP-2
This clinical based presentation will compare the use of autogenous bone vs BMP-2 for alveolar ridge reconstruction. The science, indications, advantages and disadvantages of each approach will be featured. Single tooth to full arch reconstruction cases will also be shown along with understanding the application of non-resorbable vs resorbable mesh barriers for alveolar ridge reconstruction.
| Presented By: |
Michael A Pikos, DDS |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
|
|
Atrophic Posterior Maxillan and Mandible: Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Mandibular Block Autografts
Autogenous bone grafts have been used for many years for alveolar ridge augmentation and are still considered to be the gold standard for jaw reconstruction. The use of these grafts with osseointegrated implants was originally discussed by Brånemark et al., who used the iliac crest as the donor site. For repair of most localized alveolar defects, however, bone grafts from the mandible offer advantages over iliac crest grafts. These include the proximity of donor and recipient sites, convenient surgical access, decreased donor site morbidity and decreased cost. This article focuses on posterior maxillary and mandibular osseous augmentation in a staged approach for implant placement. Both horizontal and vertical deficiencies are addressed with the use of symphysis and ramus buccal shelf donor block bone via case presentations.
|
|
|
|