Video Details
|
ANYTIME Immediate Loading Utilizing a Minimally Invasive Approach in Posterior Maxilla
Description:
This lecture will highlight a modified approach to the management of the posterior maxilla using a minimally invasive approach to sinus lift and augmentation. It will also focus on a modified implant placement protocol for obtaining and maintaining the ideal primary and secondary stability for immediate loading in the maxillary unilateral posterior area. The long term clinical results of the over 97% success rate for that protocol will be shown.
In this lecture, new guidelines and factors for the successful anytime loading in the unilateral posterior maxilla will be discussed.
Date Added:
6/6/2014
Author(s):
Young-Ku Heo, DDS, CAGS, MSD, PhD
Dr. Young-Ku Heo completed his advanced graduate study in prosthodontics and received his degree of master of science in dentistry in 1997 at Boston University, School of Dent...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / ANYTIME Immediate Loading Utilizing a Minimally Invasive Approach in Posterior Maxilla
Questions & Comments
|
Sok Chea - (6/14/2016 9:11 AM)
I have tried almost 50 cases on immediate loading with Neo-Biotech implant, so far I have no case of failure. Thanks Dr. Young-Ku Heo for intruding me Neo-Biotech implant system.
|
Osama Abdel Qader - (6/11/2014 1:15 AM)
very nice presentation
thank u
|
Dat Pham686 - (6/10/2014 7:25 AM)
Great presentation. Thank you for sharing.
|
Muhammad Saleh - (6/8/2014 2:53 PM)
Nice presentation, I can see that almost all sites at which this technique is used are healed sites, is this a pre-requisite for using this approach.
Thanks for sharing you experience.
|
Nicolas Aronna - (6/6/2014 7:21 PM)
Amazing lecture and very well supported concept. At the level of master class. Congratulations
|
zaid tayob - (6/6/2014 6:42 PM)
Dr Young, Thank you for a truly amazing presentation. What I have seen here is contrary to my traditional training regarding placing of implants in periodontally compromised environments and unilateral areas of immediate loading. I would like to know how you would select your patients for these cases?
|
Related Videos |
|
|
Is There One or More Reasons to Optimize the PRF & PRP Protocols? Future Trends in Dentistry, Orthopedics and Facial Aesthetics
The “Advanced” PRF (A-PRF) and “Injectable” PRF (I-PRF) protocols were designed with this new concept. Indications are numerous in all medical fields where we need regeneration: bone, cartilage, skin etc...
However, the use of growth factors is not a guarantee of long term stability, as they are active only at the beginning of the process. Numerous rules of tissue engineering have to be applied to maintain the regenerated bone through an adequate blood supply: this lecture is an enlightenment on the biological and mechanical conditions for long term stability of the bone: “grafted bone” or “bone around implants”.
Presented By:: |
Joseph Choukroun, MD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Restoration of Optimal Esthetics in Complex Clinical Situations
Patients often neglect or delay dental care for an extended time because of their negative experiences with and fear of dental treatments. This neglect may result in the advance of periodontitis with severe bone loss, a substantial number of missing teeth, and problems with the remaining teeth. Preexisting malocclusion can aggravate this condition. This case report
demonstrates an interdisciplinary strategic approach, in combination with the use of biologically grounded, clinically proven, and viable techniques and technologies to restore optimal esthetics and function in such complex cases. The authors emphasize the importance of carefully planning the timing and sequence of performing periodontal, orthodontic, and implant therapies. The advanced techniques and technologies successfully implemented in this case report include the growth factor and titanium mesh (Ti mesh)-assisted bone augmentation; ovate pontic-mediated, noninvasive soft tissue contouring; and photofunctionalization
Presented By:: |
Tomohiro Ishikawa, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 2 of 2
There are several techniques and materials available for implant site development. The choice may depend on a number of factors including size of the defect, osseous morphology, costs and surgeon or patient preferences. Autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard of graft materials. The trend today is to reduce patient morbidity but still provide predictable outcomes. This lecture will discuss the use of autogenous bone versus using bioactive modifiers such as platelet concentrates, rhPDGF and rhBMP-2 as replacement for the need to harvest bone.
Presented By:: |
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Eduication Credit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Current Concepts in Bioactivity and Regeneration
In this lecture, tips on how to deal with the different types of extraction socket, mostly infected, will be presented. The use of plasma rich in growth factors and the Endoret® (PRGF®) fibrin membrane is a key factor to enhance socket regeneration, post-operative recovery and minimize/treat complications.
Presented By:: |
Eduardo Anitua, MD, DDS, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Biological Bone Augmentation- Only for REAL BONE BUILDERS
This webinar is addressed to all clinicians, who want to learn safe and predictable bone harvesting and augmentation techniques for different clinical situations. Clear guidelines for the use of augmentative procedures like the Split bone technique by Prof. Khoury and Biological Bone Augmentation with pure autogenous bone and advanced soft tissue management in order to achieve predicable results will be provided.
Presented By:: |
Frank Zastrow, DDS, M.Sc. |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
|
Reconstruction of Damaged Fresh Sockets by Connective-Bone Sliver Graft From the Maxillary Tuberosity, to Enable Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration - A Clinical Case
This paper describes a procedure for immediate
loading of an implant following tooth extraction, in
a socket presenting severe damage to the vestibular
bone plate and gingival recession in the region of the
upper central incisors. The procedures of extraction
of the tooth, immediate insertion of the implant, connective-
bone graft from the maxillary tuberosity and
immediate restoration were shown to be a predictable
treatment alternative. These procedures led
to restoration of the tooth, bone and gingival structures
in a single surgical stage and to maintenance
of the favorable esthetic and functional result 24
months afterwards.
Author(s): |
José Carlos Martins da Rosa, DDS, MS;Darcymar Martins da Rosa; Carla Mônica Zardo; Ariádene Cristina Pértile de Oliveira Rosa; Luigi Canullo |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
Retrospective Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: The Effect of Bone Grafting at Implant Placement
One method to measure the success of dental implant treatment is to evaluate marginal peri-implant bone-level changes and stability over time. The location of the fixture–abutment interface (FAI) can be of major importance when the goal is to construct esthetic restorations. In these situations the FAI is often placed in a more apical position to create an ideal emergence profile for the prosthetic construction. However, several animal studies have reported that placement of the FAI in a subcrestal position may result in peri-implant marginal bone loss. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of the implant for implants with reduced abutment diameters placed non-submerged and in subcrestal positions.
Author(s): |
Alan Fetner, DMD;Theofilos Koutouzis, DDS; Michael Fetner, DMD; Tord Lundgren, DDS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|