Video Details
|
Guided, Flapless, Immediate Load Implant Dentistry - Part 1
Description:
In this first of a series, utilizing both lectures and clinical videos, Dr. John Roberts presents a thorough and well integrated clinical protocol called Smart Implants for utilizing CT guided flapless implant placement with immediate loading to restore full arches. Virtual planning, impression taking, managing slight positional discrepancies as well as the occlusion and VDO are just a few of the important clinical issues that are described in depth.
Date Added:
5/7/2010
Author(s):
John Roberts, DDS
Dr. John Roberts graduated from the University of the Pacific in 1995. He is proud to have had the opportunity to teach various live patient programs on cosm...
[read more]
|
|
Online Videos / Surgery / Implant / Guided, Flapless, Immediate Load Implant Dentistry - Part 1
|
Questions & Comments
|
John Roberts - (5/27/2010 5:37 AM)
Dr. ZEITMAN, The guide keys each have a different internal diameter so that you can start with a 2mm drill, then change to a larger drill, etc. All guided. The tubes have 4.5mm diameter, so no guidance for anything smaller than 4.5mm diameter.
|
BARRY ZEITMAN611 - (5/20/2010 1:58 PM)
Great technique! Why is the surgical guide key used? Why don't the tubes in the surgical guide provide proper orientation.
Tank You.
|
John Roberts - (5/18/2010 7:32 AM)
Dr. Durrani, We mix 10 to 15% by weight Barium sulfate in the powder of the denture acrylic. This takes excessive mixing, I like the coffee grinder. The denture is scanned in the mouth and the screws are surgical 2x15. A list of the supplies is posted on www.smartimplants.info
John.
|
DR FARHAN DURRANI - (5/15/2010 10:06 AM)
excellent technique ,please tell how you duplicate the Denture with barium sulphate material ,plus you keep the denture in mouth and scan right ,screws used are same as used in oral surgical procedures?
DR FARHAN DURRANI INDIA
|
John Roberts - (5/13/2010 9:10 AM)
Dr. Milind Saudagar,
Thank you for the comment. I don't disagree with the Nobel pins, they are very nice, however discomfort has never been an issue. The differences between this and Nobel are: 1. the bridge carrier is unique. It would be a huge advantage to any doctor doing the all on four procedure, although, nobel could acquire this patent and incorporate it into their system. 2. Because everything is made on a stereolithic master model we can incorporate a metal framework in a bridge with the holes placed and flanges removed pre operatively compared to altering an existing denture. Faster, easier and stronger. Again, the unique carrier allows this and insures the occlusion is correct.
The sophistication and precision of all the guided systems today are excellent; all are defining the standard of care. This system is not implant brand specific, I have done several cases with Nobel implants with great success. In fact, I place Nobel in my office.
John.
|
milind saudagar - (5/9/2010 6:47 AM)
good video. but nobel guide seems to be much more sofisticated & precision is high. also the retention screws might cause more discomfort than the pins used in nobel guide. this is a very good alternative procedure, if one is not using nobel biocare implants. thank you for the information
|
vijailakshmi acharya - (5/9/2010 4:16 AM)
excellent information doctor >would like to know whether the local lab can make these scans or it has to be made at a dedicated place .How different is this from Nobelguide scan procedure where one has to scan the denture separately and then with the patient wearing the denture. what prescription do you send for the slice views in the Dicom format? I never get the same images back every time from the scan centre .Thank you very much
|
Yoram Rosen - (5/8/2010 12:09 PM)
Bravo,very nice wark!!!!!!!
|
Related Videos |
|
|
|
|
Socket Shield; What Do We Know, What´s New?
The Socket Shield technique is a “new” procedure with 10 years of documented successful cases worldwide. Lately we have done some new proposals like the way we extract the lingual slice, the relation of the shield level to the bone, the use of miniflaps, the distance between implant and shield just to mention some.
On the other hand, the only minor “problem” with this technique is the “external shield exposure” and here I propose the method of successful treatment.
We will see the convenience of applying SS to molars also on the light of the paper of Dr. Mataraso from 2009. The molar SS is a viable alternative rather than ridge preservation techniques.
| Presented By:: |
Jorge Campos Aliaga, DDS, PhD |
| Presentation Style: |
Video |
| Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Alternative & New Tendencies for Alveolar Reconstruction in Modern Implant Dentistry
Knowledge of bone biology and physiology are crucial for successful dento-alveolar reconstruction. The presentation will review the natural healing process of the bone and the sequence of events needed for proper regeneration.
This process will then be discussed and compare with the present materials and technologies available in the market including alloplastics and allogenic materials. The role of the Stem Cells and rh-BMP2 will be exposed as part of these new trends in alveolar reconstruction for modern implant dentistry. Multiple cases will be presented demonstrating the versatility and outcomes in different clinical situations based on biological, bio-mechanics, and implant aesthetic needs.
| Presented By:: |
Alejandro Vivas-Rojo, DDS, MS;Jesus A. Gomez, DDS |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Smile Design and 3D Printing of Treatment Provisionals in Modern Dental Practice
DSD protocol is special in that it fosters True “Team Synergy” between the Restorative Dentist to Laboratory and Specialist. This results in more predictable treatment outcomes from simple Smile Cases to Full Mouth Rehabilitations involving natural teeth to dental implants. Finally, by learning DSD’s unique connection to the Emotional component of Dentistry, you will gain skills on how to Consult, Present, and Gain High Levels of Case Acceptance.
| Presented By:: |
John Heimke, DMD, MPH, FAGD |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Challenges & Management of Peri-Implant Pink Esthetics in Anterior Implant Therapy
When considering implant therapy in the esthetic zone, replicating the natural soft tissue frame may present challenges for the treating clinician. This presentation will highlight different clinical scenarios in which the lack of hard and soft tissue volume may pose difficulties in achieving ideal peri-implant esthetics, in addition to available clinical strategies on how to manage and minimize hard and soft tissue deficiencies when dealing with implant therapy in the esthetic zone.
| Presented By:: |
Sherif Yousri Said, BDS |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Titanium Membrane at Implant Placement: A Case Report and Literature Discussion
Reconstruction of the oral supporting tissues lost by disease or trauma is essential to tooth replacement with dental
implant therapy. This treatment requires evidence based augmentative procedures combined with up-to-date and
current techniques. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) aims to initialize this process of alveolar ridge reconstruction by
utilizing biologically active and supportive materials best coupled to the body’s healing processes. The use of nonresorbable,
titanium membranes can achieve GBR by ensuring graft stability and space maintenance so as to ensure
optimal neovascularization. Hereafter is a case report of a ridge defect reconstructed at implant placement, with the
rationale and current, evidence-based literature discussed.
| Author(s): |
Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD, PhD;Jonathan Du Toit |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diameter Selection of Implants Placed in Extraction Sockets: A New Approach
Implant placement in extraction sockets is considered a daunting challenge
due to offering risks of bone remodeling and consequent gingival alterations. Objective: This
study aims at proposing a protocol for selecting the diameter of upper anterior osseointegrated
implants placed in extraction sockets. This protocol was based on the bucco-palatal dimension of
the socket and allows a 3-mm gap to form between the implant and the outer surface of the buccal
bone wall. Such gap must be filled with biomaterial or autograft so as to increase the predictability
of long-term results.
| Author(s): |
José Carlos Martins da Rosa, DDS, MS;Ariádene Cristina Pértile de Oliveira Rosa; Carlos Eduardo Fra ncischone; Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
