Video Details
|
Immediate Implants: Partial / Full Arch Rehabilitation & GBR - Part 2
Description:
By scientific studies produced in recent years has been confirmed, in selected cases, the validity of the post-extraction implants. The use of this method implies a lower emotional impact, a single surgery and a healing often better for the patient. We will be discussed traumatic extraction methods, perfect insertion of the implants with or without bone regeneration with bone substitutes and membranes and the opportunity to combine an advanced method as immediate implant with the execution of an immediate loading to restore aesthetics in more complex cases.
Date Added:
3/16/2017
Author(s):
Alfonso Coscarella, DDS
Dr. Alfonso Coscarella in 1986 graduated in Dentistry at the University of Siena with a thesis in Endodontics with Professor Riccardo Garberoglio. Thanks to D...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Immediate Implants: Partial / Full Arch Rehabilitation & GBR - Part 2
Questions & Comments
|
Alfonso Coscarella - (3/26/2017 11:00 AM)
Thank you Maurice!
|
Maurice Salama - (3/22/2017 5:25 PM)
Alfonso; You did a great job organizing your material and supporting it with sound science. Thank you Maurice
|
Alfonso Coscarella - (3/13/2017 2:54 PM)
I would like to thank Maurice Salama, Tyler Binner and all the colleagues who partecipated in the webinar...
Thank you !
|
Alfonso Coscarella - (3/12/2017 6:48 PM)
I agree, Paolo. Thank you and a big hug!
|
PAOLO Mastrangelo - (3/12/2017 1:27 PM)
Congratulations Alfonso, top keynote! Literature and perfect selection of superb cases according to the state of the implant top brand! I repeat the words of the conclusion of our recent Coir article “Both immediate and conventional single-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla can yield satisfactory aesthetic outcomes, when performed by experienced clinicians in well-selected cases. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.“
|
Alfonso Coscarella - (3/11/2017 7:06 PM)
Thank you Alessandro! Now the goal is The bioemulation!
|
Alessandro Agnini - (3/11/2017 8:55 AM)
Great Alfonso!
Beautiful presentation and I fully agree with your conclusions!
|
Alfonso Coscarella - (3/8/2017 2:14 AM)
Thank you Jonathan!
|
Jonathan Spevak149 - (3/7/2017 5:30 PM)
Great Presentation!
|
Related Videos |
|
|
Is There One or More Reasons to Optimize the PRF & PRP Protocols? Future Trends in Dentistry, Orthopedics and Facial Aesthetics
The “Advanced” PRF (A-PRF) and “Injectable” PRF (I-PRF) protocols were designed with this new concept. Indications are numerous in all medical fields where we need regeneration: bone, cartilage, skin etc...
However, the use of growth factors is not a guarantee of long term stability, as they are active only at the beginning of the process. Numerous rules of tissue engineering have to be applied to maintain the regenerated bone through an adequate blood supply: this lecture is an enlightenment on the biological and mechanical conditions for long term stability of the bone: “grafted bone” or “bone around implants”.
Presented By:: |
Joseph Choukroun, MD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration: Autogenous Bone vs. BMP-2
For historical and biological reasons autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard of bone graft materials. For bone augmentation procedures autogenous grafts provided predictable volume gains, favorable bone quality with short healing periods. However, the need to harvest the graft and associated morbidity are inherent disadvantages. The choice of a technique for bone augmentation is dependent on a number of factors including the use of bone substitutes. More recently recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) has been shown to be effective in repairing buccal wall defects from extractions and in sinus bone grafting. The use of rhBMP-2 is currently under clinical investigation as a replacement for autograft in ridge augmentation process.
Presented By:: |
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Interpositional Bone Grafts to Treat the Posterior Atrophic Mandible
This presentation analyzes the interpositional bone graft or inlay technique, discussing the reconstructive surgical approach. Horizontal osteotomy with the interposition of bone in the form of a “sandwich” involves raising a coronal osteotomized segment of the mandible, which is still attached to the lingual periosteum, and interpositioning a block bone graft. This technique guarantees a dual vascular supply to the inlay graft from the lingual periosteum and from the residual bone; it also allows optimum use of the native basal bone, which should be less prone to resorption. The advantages and disadvantages of the inlay technique are compared with other commonly used augmentation techniques in the management of posterior mandibular atrophies.
Presented By:: |
Pietro Felice, MD, PhD, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Immediate Implants: Partial / Full Arch Rehabilitation & GBR - Part 2
By scientific studies produced in recent years has been confirmed, in selected cases, the validity of the post-extraction implants. The use of this method implies a lower emotional impact, a single surgery and a healing often better for the patient. We will be discussed traumatic extraction methods, perfect insertion of the implants with or without bone regeneration with bone substitutes and membranes and the opportunity to combine an advanced method as immediate implant with the execution of an immediate loading to restore aesthetics in more complex cases.
Presented By:: |
Alfonso Coscarella, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Contemporary and Future Trends in Advanced Bone Augmentation
Modern grafting technologies are changing at a rapid pace. To stay current we must engage new technologies and research to better face the challenges of our diverse patient population. This presentation will focus on new strategies and technologies to manage both Vertical and Horizontal Deficiencies in the partially edentulous patient. New membrane technologies, bioactive modifiers and materials will be a focus.
Presented By:: |
Maurice Salama, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances in Bone Augmentation and Related Armamentarium
The ability to predictably and successfully augment bone volume is a critical surgical and technical requirement for any clinician involved in implant dentistry. This presentation outlines the evolution of diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in bone augmentation as well as introducing new and novel biologics and armamentarium being made available for clinicians to be more efficient and efficacious in this important endeavor.
Presented By:: |
Dr. Jan Kielhorn |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
|
Reconstruction of a Horizontal and Vertical Bone defect using The Cortical Lamina Technique
For many years guided bone regeneration has been a challenge in oral and implant surgery. Many
techniques and devices have been used in trying to regenerate and reconstruct resorbed edentulous
ridges. The literature in the field is scarce due to the impossibility to perform RCT on such
lesions, therefore the judgement of the international community is based on case reports and
retrospective studies.
In the last ten years a new device has proved to be quite successful and predictable on top of
showing a very low morbidity, a membrane made of xenogeneic collagenated bone with features
that are very different from any other material used in the past.
This paper will show the application of the cortical lamina technique where a vertical and
horizontal defect was corrected and successfully restored.
|
|
|
|
Mandibular Block Autografts for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
This article reviews indications, limitations, presurgical evaluation, surgical protocol, and complications associated with mandibular block autografts harvested from the symphysis and ramus buccal shelf for alveolar ridge augmentation. The author draws from 14 years of experience with more than 500 mandibular block autografts.
|
|
|
|