Video Details
|
インプラント治療での即時負荷-日常の診療でのアプリケーション
Description:
インプラント治療について骨生物学、生物力学的リサーチを活用し、危険因子を最小にし最善の結果を得るような外科的、補綴的治療のマネジメントおよび、よく組織されたチームによる治療計画について示唆する。加えて、デジタルイメージング、CAD/CAM、テンポライゼーションが強調される。
Date Added:
1/20/2012
Author(s):
Henry Salama, DMD
[ read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Implant / Immediate Loading in Implant Dentistry - Coherent Clinical Application in Everyday Practice
Questions & Comments
|
ilir shehu - (6/8/2016 3:07 PM)
clear and comprehensive... thank you
|
abdul rashid - (8/15/2012 1:31 AM)
Fantastic lecture Dr Salama!
|
mikhail lyakhovetskiy - (7/22/2012 7:21 PM)
In case of the screw retained restoration do you use internal or external connection implants?
Mike Lyakhovetskiy
|
Fareeda Daar - (1/30/2012 6:18 PM)
Wonderful to watch your presentation as always. What material do you augment the jumping distance Henry?
regards
Fareeda Daar
|
Barry Cohen - (1/29/2012 1:18 PM)
Henry, great video. I really enjoyed your presentation and continue to learn so much from your lectures. Be well. Barry
|
Bassam Rabie - (1/22/2012 9:06 AM)
A real Implant Posthodontist Henry. Great review of all the evolving immediate loading protocols. See you soon my friend. Bassam Rabie
|
henry salama - (1/19/2012 8:59 AM)
Primary stability, as mentioned, is purely mechanical and derived from friction fit, surface micro-geometry, or thread design. Secondary stability is BIOmechanical and represents what we define as "osseointegration". Cumulative stability is the term we assigned to the sum value of the two active processes as measured at any one time. The reason that they're important to conceptualize is that it can help the clinician to choose implant designs and clinical protocols that will ensure that cumulative stability remains at a level capable of achieving osseointegration even in an immediate loaded or provisional restoration.
|
Gustavo Perdomo - (1/18/2012 11:48 PM)
Great Presentation Henry. You have been always an excellent clinician , speaker and contributor to our field in Dentistry. Aesthetics, Phonetics, Function and long term Prosthesis for our patients.
Thank you
Gustavo Perdomo, DMD, CAGS Boston, MA
|
Dr Juan Carlos Lutteral - (1/18/2012 9:42 PM)
Great again!! Thank you very much Dr. Salama!
|
|
Related Videos |
|
|
The Modern Age of Regeneration: Tenting, Fixating and Space Creation
Regeneration requires a common biological thread for predictable results. Space Maintenance, Graft Stability, Bone Biologics, and Wound Management. This presentation will describe the importance of each critical step in regeneration and introduce a new technical system to assist the surgeon in managing and stabilizing the space required for optimal bone regeneration. Flap design, release, biologics selection and enhancement as well as bone stabilization, fixation, and secure membrane adaptation will be further highlighted as to it's critical value in the final results.
Presented By:: |
Homa Zadeh, DDS, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Implants in the Esthetic Zone: Pitfalls & Solutions
Implants in the anterior jaws are predicated by aesthetic outcomes. This is largely dependent on the reasons for tooth loss, the hard and soft tissue conditions following tooth loss, the timing of implant placement etc. This presentation dwells on a few clinical examples of the pitfalls of anterior zone implant therapy and the strategies employed to overcome the same.
Presented By:: |
T.V. Narayan |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
|
Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface
Emerging concepts in implant dentistry have allowed bone preservation to become a reality, thus reducing the need for extensive augmentation procedures. Nevertheless, clinicians are still confronted with atrophic defects that require complex regenerative strategies for dental implant rehabilitation. This presentation will focus on some of the essential elements for a predictable regenerative protocol in implant site development.
A discussion will include the use of defect topography as a guide in choosing a suitable augmentation technique. Several considerations that allow for tension free wound closure will be reviewed. Furthermore, an evidence based approach in graft material selection will be presented.
Clinical cases will then be reviewed, to demonstrate how to integrate the presented principles into daily clinical practice.
Presented By:: |
Ehab Moussa, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction to Osseointegration and Modern Implant Dentistry: Part 2 of 2
This introduction gives a brief history of implant dentistry and the foundation of the modern era based on osseointegration. The principles of osseointegration will be outlined along with a detailed review of the healing sequence associated with it and how that directly influences clinical decisions. In addition, a review is presented of implant biomaterials and surfaces and how they influence the process of osseointegration.
Presented By:: |
Henry Salama, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
The Changing Paradigm of Digital Implant Dentistry: Today’s Technology and Tomorrow’s Concepts - Part 2 of 2
Digital technology has revolutionized implant dentistry but not without frustration. Recent advances with hardware, software, and materials now present integrated solutions for the implant team through planning, placement, and restoration. Single implant treatment will be presented for every-day practice, as well as more advanced partial and fully-edentulous techniques. The most efficient and precise workflows through Keystone and its industry partners will give you concrete digital solutions ready for implementation in your practice. At the conclusion of the lecture the speaker will define some different “team structures” for how the surgeon, dentist, and lab could invest in technology and work together.
Presented By:: |
Peter Barndt, DDS, MDSc, FACP |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Colocação imediata de implantes na zona anterior
Para uma reabilitação implanto-suportada com um bom resultado estético existem certos requisitos que devem ser respeitados. O Dr. Miguel Stanley e o Dr. João Amaral fazem a sua revisão neste artigo.
|
|
|
|
Nifedipine-induced Gingival Enlargemenr Around Dental Implants
Calcium channel-blocking agents are used extensively for the management of cardiovascular conditions, including angina pectoris, coronary artery spasm, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypertension. Gingival overgrowth around natural teeth has been previously reported in the literature with patients taking calcium channel-blocking agents. This clinical report describes hyperplasia of tissues around titanium dental implants in a patient taking Nifedipine along with the multiphasic approach to treating this…
Author(s): |
Lee H. Silverstein, DDS, MS, FACD, FICD;J. Paul Koch, DMD, Michael D. Lefkove, DDS, Jerry J. Garnick, DDS, MS, Baldev Singh, BDS, PhD, David E. Steflik, MS, EdD |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
Crestal Bone Stability around Implants with Horizontally Matching Connection after Soft Tissue Thickening: A Prospective Clinical Trial
It has been shown that thin mucosal tissues may be an important factor in crestal bone loss etiology. Thus,
it is possible that mucosal tissue thickening with allogenic membrane might reduce crestal bone loss.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how implants with traditional connection maintain crestal bone level
after soft tissue thickening with allogenic membrane.
After 1-year follow-up, implants in group A had 1.65 1 0.08-mm bone loss mesially and 1.81 1 0.06 mm distally.
Group B had 0.31 1 0.05 mm mesially and 0.34 1 0.05 mm distally. C group implants experienced bone loss of 0.44 1
0.06 mm mesially and 0.47 1 0.07 mm distally. Differences between A and B, and A and C were significant both
mesially and distally, whereas differences between B and C were not significant mesially and distally
Author(s): |
Tomas Linkevicius, DDS, Dip Pros, PhD;Algirdas Puisys, DDS; Laura Linkeviciene, DDS, PhD; Vytaute Peciuliene, DDS, PhD; Markus Schlee, DDS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|