Video Details
|
Innovative Technique for Ridge Augmentation Using SonicWeld RX Rigid Resorbable Barrier System - Part 5 of 5
Description:
In this fifth of a 5 part series, Dr. Gerhard Iglhaut describes the science as well as the step-by-step techniques for utilizing an innovative new resorbable rigid membrane and fixation system for ridge augmentation. This approach utilizes the Resorb-X polymer as a totally new method of craniomaxillofacial applications which consists of pure poly D, L-lactic acid (PDLLA) to isolate an osseous defect for guided bone regeneration (GBR). The advantages result from achieving an extremely stable and space preserving membrane for GBR.
Date Added:
5/2/2011
Author(s):
Gerhard Michael Iglhaut, DDS
Dr. Iglhaut completed his degree in dentistry in 1982 at the Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Germany. He worked as a scientific assistant in the department of Oral Surger...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Innovative Technique for Ridge Augmentation Using SonicWeld RX Rigid Resorbable Barrier System - Part 5 of 5
Questions & Comments
|
Maurice Salama - (7/14/2013 8:43 AM)
Nicolas; Yes, these products are available in Europe. Click directly on the KLS Martin Link from the Left side of the screen or the Product Page to find out more. Dr. Salama
|
Nicolas Aronna - (7/14/2013 8:23 AM)
Are the KLS products authorized to be sold in Europe? I live in Spain and unfortunately here the restrictions are too strict...
Thanks
|
Danny O'Keefe - (10/18/2012 12:16 PM)
Great, even if I don't treat I will know what can be and what to expect
|
BORNA RASHIDISANGSARY - (6/27/2012 9:22 AM)
Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect.
"Vince Lombardi"
Thank you for your perfect presentation Dr. Iglhaut
|
Maria Rios - (3/8/2012 10:01 AM)
Very good presentation. Now I have to watch the other 4parts
Dr Maria O. Rios
|
Samuel Hyatt - (12/10/2011 4:43 AM)
no video is available
|
joakim aslanidis - (9/14/2011 11:34 AM)
phantastic presentation!!!
|
Matt Hauck - (5/9/2011 6:03 PM)
From Dr. Iglhaut:
the name of the ozon device is OzonytronX, the new version Ozonix. Please
visit the website: http://www.biozonix.de
|
Matt Hauck - (5/9/2011 4:12 PM)
I will ask Dr. Iglhaut about the Ozone treatment - I don't think it is available in the US, but it is available in Germany.
|
|
Related Videos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration - Labial Contour Grafting at the Time of Immediate Placement
Until recently, tooth replacement at compromised sites in the aesthetic zone, required long-term treatment with possible undesirable complications in the tissue architecture. The Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration (IDR) is a technique established to broaden indications for immediate loading on individual teeth. In this way, tissue losses with varied extensions are reconstructed in the same surgical session of implant placement and provisional crown installation, reducing the number of interventions and keeping predictability on aesthetic aspects. The IDR, which advocates minimally invasive procedures, will be presented as a viable and reproducible alternative.
Presented By:: |
José Carlos Martins da Rosa, DDS, MS |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Subperiosteal Implants - The New Approach for the Extreme Atrophic Jaws
Subperiosteal implants started in the 40’s but were discontinued due to the poor success rates in the long term.
Today, 80 years later, a completely different technology has emerged, bringing Subperiosteal implants to the next level.
Presented By:: |
Bernardo Nunes de Sousa, DDS, MSc |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Advanced Bone Grafting Techniques: Part 1 - Autogenous Bone Blocks in the Reconstruction of the Atrophic Mandibular Ridge
This lecture will describe the use of autologous onlay block bone grafting for reconstruction of moderate to severe atrophic posterior mandibular alveolar ridge. This will include a discussion of the various options to this form of grafting, such as Short implants, Lingual positioning, nerve re-positioning, distraction osteogenesis, and GBR. The Mutli-Tier onlay Bone Graft Technique will be highlighted in this presentation. Additionally, a review of a recently submitted research paper of long term follow up of implants placed into autologous bone blocks harvested from the mandibular ramus, retromolar and sympheseal areas will be discussed.
A description of surgical donor harvest sites in the mandible will also be performed as well as post op healing of these sites. Additional time will be spent reviewing causes of failure with bone blocks and implants placed into these sites.
Presented By:: |
Devorah Schwartz-Arad, DMD, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Current Concepts in Bioactivity and Regeneration
In this lecture, tips on how to deal with the different types of extraction socket, mostly infected, will be presented. The use of plasma rich in growth factors and the Endoret® (PRGF®) fibrin membrane is a key factor to enhance socket regeneration, post-operative recovery and minimize/treat complications.
Presented By:: |
Eduardo Anitua, MD, DDS, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 2 of 2
There are several techniques and materials available for implant site development. The choice may depend on a number of factors including size of the defect, osseous morphology, costs and surgeon or patient preferences. Autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard of graft materials. The trend today is to reduce patient morbidity but still provide predictable outcomes. This lecture will discuss the use of autogenous bone versus using bioactive modifiers such as platelet concentrates, rhPDGF and rhBMP-2 as replacement for the need to harvest bone.
Presented By:: |
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Eduication Credit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Atrophic Posterior Maxillan and Mandible: Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Mandibular Block Autografts
Autogenous bone grafts have been used for many years for alveolar ridge augmentation and are still considered to be the gold standard for jaw reconstruction. The use of these grafts with osseointegrated implants was originally discussed by Brånemark et al., who used the iliac crest as the donor site. For repair of most localized alveolar defects, however, bone grafts from the mandible offer advantages over iliac crest grafts. These include the proximity of donor and recipient sites, convenient surgical access, decreased donor site morbidity and decreased cost. This article focuses on posterior maxillary and mandibular osseous augmentation in a staged approach for implant placement. Both horizontal and vertical deficiencies are addressed with the use of symphysis and ramus buccal shelf donor block bone via case presentations.
|
|
|
|
|
Reconstruction of a Single-Tooth Traumatic Defect in the Anterior Maxilla Using the Khoury Bone Plate Graft
Trauma to teeth and the dentoalveolar process may result in a ridge defect that precludes straightforward implant
therapy of the patient. Typically bone and soft tissue augmentation of the area would first be needed to adequately
prepare the tissues for the implant and its restoration..Grafting of the site is substantially more difficult in cases where
the ridge also lacks adequate height, and techniques to recreate a bony envelope to apply guided bone regeneration
may be required. Moreover, defects in the anterior aesthetic zone that require both bone and soft tissue grafting and
a restoration that harmonizes the adjacent pink and white aesthetics may be an even more significant challenge to
the restorative team. Hereafter a case of trauma to an anterior maxillary tooth that saw destruction of the ridge is
presented, with the defect reconstructed to accommodate a functional and aesthetically pleasing implant supported
restoration.
Author(s): |
Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD, PhD;Jonathan Du Toit, BChD |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|