Dental Education
Online Dental Education Dental education lectures and videos Online dental ce Dental education articles Expert dental educators Dental products education Dental Community
 
Video Details
Platform Switching: Myth or Reality

Description:
In this first in an ongoing series, Dr. Dennis Tarnow, Professor & Chairman, Dept. of Implant Dentistry New York University College of Dentistry, discusses the popular concept of platform switching as it relates to crestal bone stability, health, survival and color of the soft. In this section, the biology, research and relevance of where the biologic width exists on the implant and how it is affected by clinical circumstances related to macro and micro-geometries of various implant designs is discussed in detail. In addition, how this concept applies to adjacent implants is also outlined.

Date Added:
11/11/2009

Author(s):

Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS
Dennis P. Tarnow is currently Clinical Professor of Periodontology and Director of Implant Education at Columbia School of Dental Medicine. Dr. Tarnow has a certificate...
[read more]






Online Videos / Surgery / Implant / Platform Switching: Myth or Reality




Questions & Comments
farshad bajoghli - (11/25/2010 4:58 PM)

great information.i wish we could see the pointer on the slides.because there was no way to see where the pointer was pointing at.but the concept was there.thanks

Devapratim Mohanty - (7/18/2010 8:53 AM)

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jul;65(7 Suppl 1):33-9. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. Hürzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany. markus@huerzeler.biz CONCLUSION: The concept of platform switching appears to limit crestal resorption and seems to preserve peri-implant bone levels. A certain amount of bone remodeling 1 year after final reconstruction occurs, but significant differences concerning the peri-implant bone height compared with the nonplatform-switched abutments are still evident 1 year after final restoration. The reduction of the abutment of 0.45 mm on each side (5 mm implant/4.1 mm abutment) seems sufficient to avoid peri-implant bone loss. Hope it is allowed to quote studies, Will like to have the valued views of the experts about this offset of 0.45 mm each side as optimum.

Simon Milbauer - (7/18/2010 2:22 AM)

I was reading the commments and start to think whether platform shifting in a form like nobel replace implants for example makes sense. In order to platform switch an adapter has to be attached. this creates an external hex with its weaknesses, and perhaps two microgaps are present once the adaptor is attached. Is it really worth to platform switch implants in this fashion or better to use ines with "built in" platform shift like bicon, ankylos etc? thanks for comments. Simon M.

Devapratim Mohanty - (7/18/2010 12:50 AM)

Thanks a lot Dr Salama for the answer. Wish some one can comment on the most commonly used offset. That will be valuable.

henry salama - (7/16/2010 6:03 AM)

One can apply the platform switch to many implant systems just by mismatching components, i.e. using a narrower diameter abutment than the width of the implant. However, there are a few implants that are specifically designed to gain a greater benefit from the concept and have a rigid connection that I believe synergistically amplifies the effect, i.e. Ankylos, Astra etc. As to what is the most beneficial offset, I am not aware of any studies that give us guidance o that issue.

Devapratim Mohanty - (7/15/2010 7:23 PM)

Sorry for the typing error, I meant implant diameter to abutment diameter.

Devapratim Mohanty - (7/15/2010 12:13 PM)

Which Implant systems are platform switch compartible? Or is just mismatching the implant diameter to the implant diameter will serve the purpose?Last but not the least which is the optimum mismatch ratio for optimum result?

Mitch Silverman - (12/29/2009 6:09 AM)

Thank you Dr. Tarnow. Great lecture! Excellent information.

Gerald Niznick - (12/28/2009 7:52 PM)

[quote=Jay Lutsky]Finally we are back to the key point. Bone loss at the crest is a multifactorial challenge that requires a multi-faceted response. Whether you believe in platform switching or not, there are definitely other factors that are important to consider in your surgical and restorative planning. I'm interested in what other clinicians believe are the other important clinical factors governing bone as well as soft tissue stability and esthetics success.[/quote]

Notice that you are questioning "soft tissue stability". That is another opportunity for a company to claim design differentiation by making something that no one else wants to make - grooves on the neck of the implant that are not much different than machining score lines. Just look at BioHorizons' ad/link on this website: Touting Laser-Loc by using a quote from Myron Nevins "A true physical connective tissue attachment." If you want to maintain the soft tissue, you need to maintain the hard tissue - one follows the other. Sure you can graft to create a thick piece of tissue to simulate a papilla. Bob James from Loma Linda showed 25 years ago that you get a hemi-desmisomal attachment of soft tissue to titanium, and that was when people worried that an endosseous implant created a pathway of infection into the bone. Branemark showed that if you had the implant projecting through unattached soft tissue, it did not effect bone loss or implant survival so what is a "true physical connective tissue attachment other than a marketing story to create a "unique selling proposition. You can put Nevins up there among the best researchers money can buy. I heard Carl Misch lecture at the AAID meeting in November and he put it well when he said laser-loc was designed to maintain soft tissue. He didn't actually say it did it. An article was published in COIR earlier this year that compared fibroblast attachment to a grooved surface with grooves that were 15u, 30u and 60u. BioHorizons has grooves that in a 2mm band with 12u depth for bone and 8u for soft tissue, as if you could get that half and half band just where you wanted it and the tissue/bone would stay there. At least with micro-threads, you are providing grooves a lot closer to the 60u size and provide additional threaded stability as well. But there are micro-threads and there are micro-threads. They differ in depth and design. What do you not want is micro-threads that cross-thread the bony threads created by the body threads. This can result if the spacing and pitch of the micro-threads do not coordinate with the body threads. The US Patent Office agreed with me that there was one unique combination that eliminated cross-threading while offering the advantages of deeper micro-threads for real bone engagement and double lead body threads for speed of insertion.

Related Videos
Extraction Site Micro-gap and Treatment Options in Implant Therapy Premium Member Content

Extraction Site Micro-gap and Treatment Options in Implant Therapy
Extraction site management with special emphasis on the biology and clinical treatment options of the micro-gap.

Presented By:: Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS
Presentation Style: Lecture
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Partial Extraction Therapy (PET) in Everyday Practice: Part 2 Premium Member Content

Partial Extraction Therapy (PET) in Everyday Practice: Part 2
This presentation describes new tools, including burs and new trans-mucosal abutments, which may enhance the clinician's ability to incorporate the Socket Shield technique into their practice. In addition, incorporating in-office CAD CAM technology, such as Zirkonzahn, makes it possible to design and fabricate same-day custom restorations including the ability, under special circumstances, to go directly to the final restoration.

Presented By:: Filipe Lopes, DDS, DMD;Bernardo de Mira Corrêa, DDS, DMD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Minimally Invasive Technique for the Atrophic Jaw Rehabilitation with a Reduced Number of Implants Premium Member Content

Minimally Invasive Technique for the Atrophic Jaw Rehabilitation with a Reduced Number of Implants
THE PURPOSE OF THIS LECTURE IS TO PRESENT AN ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUE TO NORMAL SINUS LIFT IN THE UPPER JAW AND BONE GRAFT IN THE MANDIBLE WITH MINIMAL INVASIVE APPROACH TO REDUCE BIOLOGICAL COSTS , WITHOUT BONE REGENERATION WITH IMMEDIATE LOADING , IMMEDIATE AESTHETIC AND IMMEDIATE FUNCTION.

Presented By:: Prof. Dott. Angelo Cardarelli
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Effective Techniques for Placement of Narrow Diameter Implants - Part 2 of 3 Premium Member Content

Effective Techniques for Placement of Narrow Diameter Implants - Part 2 of 3
This presentation utilizes results from a prospective clinical trial as well as clinical experience to outline indications for effective and efficient utilization of narrow diameter implants in regions of limited space.

Presented By:: Michael Reddy, DMD, DMSc
Presentation Style: Lecture
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Related Courses
CadCam Customized 3D-Printed Subperiosteal Implant Premium Member Content

CadCam Customized 3D-Printed Subperiosteal Implant
When considering the future of implants, it appears justified to reconsider the old concepts in light of the availability of contemporary technologies, such as computer-aided design, softwares and programs design, virtual stress– strain testing, and 3D printing of titanium alloy. With the employment of these modern technologies, the concept of a “high-tech” subperiosteal implant has gradually emerged. Biological design of subperiosteal implant is mandatory for the success of the treatment, guidelines on architectural changes, topological optimization, and biofunctionalization will be explained. This new era of a “high-tech” customized 3D printed subperiosteal implant leads us to consider this technique s a valuable treatment option for atrophic jaws, avoiding more invasive procedures and giving the possibility of immediate loading, improving the patient’s quality of life.

Presented By:: Vladimir Garcia Lozada, DDS, MS, PhD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Controversies Surrounding Delayed vs. Immediate Implant Placement: Is There No Middle Ground? Premium Member Content

Controversies Surrounding Delayed vs. Immediate Implant Placement: Is There No Middle Ground?
Delayed vs. Immediate Implant Placement: The two camps in this debate are both adamant that their technique is the best and that theirs will give the patients the best long term aesthetic result. Is the literature and available data definitive on this matter? Is the choice really clear for clinicians? This presentation looks critically at the literature and attempts to give clinicians a more flexible approach to immediate and delayed implant placement. Critical surgical guidelines and clinical pearls will be offered for both types of treatment as well as the management of some of the complications that may arise from immediate or delayed implant placement.

Presented By:: Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD, PhD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
CBCT as an Interdisciplinary Diagnostic and Treatment Planning Tool Premium Member Content

CBCT as an Interdisciplinary Diagnostic and Treatment Planning Tool
This presentation will discuss and demonstrate the utilization of CBCT imaging from the perspective and scope of a periodontist and an oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Treatment planning, critical thinking skills and surgical execution of cases demonstrating complex dentoalveolar bone reconstruction and craniofacial deformities will be presented demonstrating how this paradigm shift has expanded capabilities and predictability to treat demanding cases.

Presented By:: Daniel B. Spagnoli, DDS, PhD;George A. Mandelaris, DDS, MS
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Related Articles
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peri-Implant Disease

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peri-Implant Disease
Although some risk factors of peri-implant disease are well defined, the lack of efficient and predictable approaches to treat peri-implantitis has created difficulty in the management of those complications. The aim of this review was the evaluate the reliability of the diagnosis methods and to provide a set of guidelines to treat peri-implant disease. A search of PubMed and a hand search of articles related to peri-implant diseases were conducted up to August 2013. A summary of the current methods for the diagnosis of peri-implantitis, its potential risk factors, and a flow chart to guide the clinical management of these conditions are presented.

Author(s): Miguel Padial-Molina, DDS, PhD; Fernando Suarez, DDS; Hector F. Rios, DDS, PhD; Pablo Galindo-Moreno, DDS, PhD; Hom-Lay Wong, DDS, MSD, PhD
View Article>>
Utilising a restorative approach to correct an adult skeletal class III malocclusion

Utilising a restorative approach to correct an adult skeletal class III malocclusion
Gerard J. Lemongello discusses all the steps taken to correct the malocclusion.

Author(s): Gerard Lemongello, DMD
View Article>>
Instrumentation for Modern Day Implant Surgery

Instrumentation for Modern Day Implant Surgery
Public awareness of the aesthetic possibilities through the replacement of missing or nonsalvageable teeth has been elevated with advances in dental implant therapy and related hard and soft tissue regenerative therapies. This has led to an increase in the fabrication of fixed prostheses supported by either natural teeth, dental implants, or removable prostheses anchored by implants rather than conventional tissue- or tooth-supported partial dentures.

Author(s): Lee H. Silverstein, DDS, MS, FACD, FICD;Peter C. Shatz, DDS
View Article>>
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©2022

Preferred Language: English Flag
Contact Us · Login · Register