Video Details
|
The Bone Reduction Template Used for Simultaneous Implant Placement and Immediate Restoration
Description:
The novel concept pioneered by Dr. Ganz harnesses the full power of CT Scan technology and interactive treatment planning software to first fabricate a template to sufficiently reduce a knife-edge ridge to receive a secondary bone-borne template for accurate implant implant placement followed by immediate restoration, all in one visit.
Date Added:
12/28/2013
Author(s):
Scott D. Ganz, DMD
Dr. Scott D. Ganz graduated from the University of Medicine and Dentistry – New Jersey Dental School. He completed a three-year specialty program in Maxillofacial P...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / The Bone Reduction Template Used for Simultaneous Implant Placement and Immediate Restoration
Questions & Comments
|
Barry Weiss - (4/11/2015 10:04 AM)
Scott: great presentation. are these still available through materalise? ad is that 1970's wood paneling behind you?
|
Barry Weiss - (4/11/2015 8:31 AM)
Filipe: ridge reduction is based on the point where a table top level can be achieved. the rest has to be made up with prosthetic
|
filipe lopes - (1/5/2014 10:14 AM)
On the final restoration we can see that there is a great amount of artificial gingiva. In this particular case don't you think the bone reduction could have bee much less than the one it was performed? In terms of attached gingiva, in the anterior region, a less agressive reduction wouldn't provide for a better soft tissue environment for the implants and perhaps a more biological prosthodontic restoration without the need for such a great amount of artificial gum on the restoration? It was not clear what are exactly the criteria for you to decide the amount of bone to be reduced. It would be handy to see how the provisionals were planned, even before virtually placing the implants, to have the "provisionals based guide" (if we can call it that way) imaging on the 3D virtual images you've shown, so as to then decide how much bone is gonna be reduced and where the implants are gonna be placed. Thx for sharing. Filipe Lopes.
|
Maurice Salama - (1/4/2014 10:29 AM)
Kevin; Materialise sells them and they cost roughly $300.
|
kevin potocsky - (1/3/2014 9:02 PM)
Where do you get the stereolithic models and how much are they?
|
Scott Ganz - (1/31/2012 2:05 PM)
Dear Anoosh -
Great question! If there is an abundance of soft tissue to work with, and the denture is removed for modification and polish, you are correct that the tissue will collapse. You have two choices: (1) use screw-receiving abutments that extend above the tissue, or (2) when you remove the denture, immediately place healing collars to keep the tissue from collapsing, until the denture is ready to be re-inserted.
Great question. Thanks!
|
Scott Ganz - (1/31/2012 2:02 PM)
Hi George... Thanks for the comments. The bone reduction template requires additional software for its fabrication, and as I do not use Nobel Clinician in its latest version. SimPlant offers three different types of templates for implants - (1) bone borne, (2) tooth borne, and (3) soft tissue borne. In order to facilitate placement of implants into a newly reduced ridge, the software must be able to produce a bone borne template. I do not know if such a template can be fabricated with Nobel or any other software.
|
George Duello - (1/30/2012 8:25 PM)
Scott,
Very nice presentation. I know you are an expert on Simplant/Materialize technology. Do you have a protocol for NobelProcera/NobelGuide technology for which I use in my practice and lectures?
George Duello
|
anoosh afifi - (1/27/2012 3:44 PM)
Once the modified lower denture is seated over the implant abutments and acrylic is set and the restoration is unscrewed for the lab phase, how difficult is it to replace the restoration back onto the implants. Would the sutured mobile tissue over the top of implants not interfere with the seating of the abutments?
|
|
Related Videos |
|
|
|
|
Modern Bone Augmentation Techniques: An Alternative Donor Site
In this lecture, Dr. Glickman will give the participants an alternative bone block harvesting site that is in the same area as the anterior maxillary teeth, eliminating the need for a second site surgery. This also provides a site that is painless and easily accesible therefore allowing the patients to have the gold standard of bone grafting rather than settling for treatment options with a more more variable outcome.
Presented By:: |
Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Contemporary and Future Trends in Advanced Bone Augmentation
Modern grafting technologies are changing at a rapid pace. To stay current we must engage new technologies and research to better face the challenges of our diverse patient population. This presentation will focus on new strategies and technologies to manage both Vertical and Horizontal Deficiencies in the partially edentulous patient. New membrane technologies, bioactive modifiers and materials will be a focus.
Presented By:: |
Maurice Salama, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Negative Factors for Soft & Hard Tissue Maintenance
Maintaining the bone is the most difficult challenge in implantology (bone grafted or native bone around implants). If a tissue want to live long, it has to follow 2 conditions: The first condition is to organize a full blood supply.. However, it’s not enough.
The solution for the long term stability is to try to organize the stability of the blood supply.. by the respect of several biologic conditions. Almost of these conditions are explained in this lecture.
We introduce here the new concept to avoid the reduction of blood supply by the periosteal incision: the soft brushing technique is the first technique which allows a very large increase of the flap without any incision: the flap closure without tension but without any incision.
Presented By:: |
Joseph Choukroun, MD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Credit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Modern Flap Management in Bone Augmentation
What does it mean “Modern”? Less traumatic? More predictable? More biology? Less incisions?
Let’s see what modern means from a biological and from a surgical standpoint. How can we achieve a full passive closure from the flaps without damaging the blood supply? Can we take care of the oxidative stress? Can PRF help us in these matters?
Surgically, the management of anatomical elements such as the mylo-hyoid muscle and the mental foramen will be discussed and a simplification protocol will also be presented. No doubt, “modern” flap management raises a lot of questions!
Presented By:: |
Jérôme Surmenian, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Modified IVAN Technique: Long-Term Follow-Up of 20 Cases Over 2 to 11 Years
When natural teeth fail, frequently there is a loss of hard and soft tissue. This may complicate subsequent dental implant placement by
creating insufficient bone to house the implant. This also occurs when the tooth has been missing for an extended period, especially in the
premaxilla, where the bone is less dense and often lacks sufficient volume of facial bone. Site reconstruction to accommodate implant
placement often requires both hard and soft tissue augmentation. The modified interpositional vascularized augmentation neogenesis
(mIVAN) technique achieves the desired treatment goals in both delayed and immediate placement scenarios. The technique will be
discussed as well as the long-term follow-up on 20 cases.
Author(s): |
Snježana Pohl, MD, DMD;Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|