Video Details
|
Bone Management in Defective Sites: What Techniques Work Best TODAY?
Description:
The trend in implant dentistry is towards minimally invasive approaches. This includes site development when inadequate available bone is present. This lecture will discuss minimally invasive autogenous bone grafting, guided bone regeneration, titanium mesh with rhBMP-2, ridge expansion and allogeneic block grafts. Surgeons should consider the advantages and disadvantages of each bone augmentation technique in a given clinical situation, and select the approach with lowest overall cost and morbidity, and the highest likelihood of success.
Date Added:
10/30/2014
Author(s):
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS
Dr. Craig M. Misch graduated from the University of Michigan School of Dentistry. He then received postgraduate certificates in prosthodontics and oral implantology as well a...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Bone Management in Defective Sites: What Techniques Work Best TODAY?
Questions & Comments
|
Tarek Assi - (1/7/2018 11:30 PM)
Excellent review of bone grafting! Thank you!!!
|
barry manson - (3/28/2017 1:03 PM)
amazing Thank you!
|
Saleh Elahwal - (8/14/2016 5:29 PM)
very informative.Thanks
|
yildiray yemenicioglu - (2/14/2015 1:01 AM)
Perfect presentation... Thanks...
|
Ron Duffin - (1/16/2015 5:28 PM)
great presentation... I did an internet study on bmmp and came across lawfirms looking for class action participants who had bmmp used for their orthopedic surgeries. Evidently their have been complications from its use. I wonder if something that is so osteoinductive would have risks of being carried away ectopically and creating bone where you don't want it. Just scratching my head a little.
|
alper gultekin - (1/7/2015 3:41 PM)
Excellent presentation.. Do you have cases with GEM 21S for vertical augmentation, what do you think about this modifier when you compare it with Infuse?
|
Hamid Kazemi - (11/14/2014 9:26 AM)
An exciting and challenging topic- Thank you for sharing your experiences and great review of literature.
|
Shingirai Zengeni153 - (11/13/2014 11:39 AM)
very informative, open and thought stimulating
|
ajay mootha - (11/4/2014 1:03 PM)
awesome......a must see for every learner/experienced....
|
|
Related Videos |
|
|
|
Alveolar Ridge Regenerative Strategies: Autogenous Bone vs BMP-2
This clinical based presentation will compare the use of autogenous bone vs BMP-2 for alveolar ridge reconstruction. The science, indications, advantages and disadvantages of each approach will be featured. Single tooth to full arch reconstruction cases will also be shown along with understanding the application of non-resorbable vs resorbable mesh barriers for alveolar ridge reconstruction.
Presented By:: |
|
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Negative Factors for Soft & Hard Tissue Maintenance
Maintaining the bone is the most difficult challenge in implantology (bone grafted or native bone around implants). If a tissue want to live long, it has to follow 2 conditions: The first condition is to organize a full blood supply.. However, it’s not enough.
The solution for the long term stability is to try to organize the stability of the blood supply.. by the respect of several biologic conditions. Almost of these conditions are explained in this lecture.
We introduce here the new concept to avoid the reduction of blood supply by the periosteal incision: the soft brushing technique is the first technique which allows a very large increase of the flap without any incision: the flap closure without tension but without any incision.
Presented By:: |
Joseph Choukroun, MD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation: Optimizing Esthetic Results for the Restorative Dentist
Contemporary patient expectations have made esthetics a major requisite of all treatment plans, especially in situations where there is a high smile line. Although new restorative materials have highly improved predictability and esthetic outcomes, soft and hard tissue management play a fundamental role when working in esthetic areas. To achieve ideal esthetics, preservation of the natural soft and hard tissue architecture is a primary clinical objective. These new proposed techniques illustrate the importance of pre-prosthetic soft and hard tissue management when working in highly esthetic compromised areas.
Presented By:: |
Giuseppe Cicero, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface
Emerging concepts in implant dentistry have allowed bone preservation to become a reality, thus reducing the need for extensive augmentation procedures. Nevertheless, clinicians are still confronted with atrophic defects that require complex regenerative strategies for dental implant rehabilitation. This presentation will focus on some of the essential elements for a predictable regenerative protocol in implant site development.
A discussion will include the use of defect topography as a guide in choosing a suitable augmentation technique. Several considerations that allow for tension free wound closure will be reviewed. Furthermore, an evidence based approach in graft material selection will be presented.
Clinical cases will then be reviewed, to demonstrate how to integrate the presented principles into daily clinical practice.
Presented By:: |
Ehab Moussa, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
|
Flapless Postextraction Socket Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: Part 1. The Effect of Bone Grafting and/or Provisional Restoration on Facial-Palatal Ridge Dimensional Change
The dental literature has reportted vertical soft tissue changes that can occur with immediate implant placement, bone grafting, and provisional restoration ranging from a gain or loss of 1.0mm. However, little is known of the effects of facial-palatal collapse of the ridge due to these clinical procedures. Based upon treatment modalities rendered, an ensuing contour change can occur with significant negative esthetic consequences. The results of a retrospective clinical cohort study evaluating the change in horizontal ridge dimension associated with implant placement in anterior postextraction sockets are presented for four treatment groups. Therefore, it is recommended to place a bone graft and contoured healing abutment or provisional restoration at the time of flapless postextraction socket implant placement.
Author(s): |
Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS;Stephen J. Chu, DMD, MSD, CDT;Maurice Salama, DMD;Christian F.J. Stappert, DDS, MS, PhD, Priv-Doz;Henry Salama, DMD;David Garber, DMD;Guido O. Sarnachiaro, DDS; Evangelina Sarnachiaro, DDS; Sergio Luis Gotta, DDS; Hanae Saito, DDS, MS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|