Video Details
|
Partners in Synergy - The Webinar Event; Augmentation Strategies in Implant Dentistry
Description:
This course will highlight the current available regenerative techniques and protocols to maximize the esthetic results of tooth replacement therapy. Extraction site management, labial bone enhancement as well as current gingival augmentation techniques will be featured. These highly acclaimed clinicians and educators will team up to provide a glimpse of their upcoming LIVE Synergy VI conference June 11th - 14th, 2015 in Orlando, Florida.
Date Added:
3/2/2015
Author(s):
Maurice Salama, DMD
Dr. Maurice A. Salama completed his undergraduate studies at the State University
of New York at Binghamton in 1985, where he received his BS in Biology. Dr. Salama
r...
[read more]
|
|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Partners in Synergy - The Webinar Event; Augmentation Strategies in Implant Dentistry
|
Questions & Comments
|
Chris pace - (1/7/2016 9:50 AM)
What are the criteria in determining if I should use PRF or PRGF? Thank you.
|
kevin potocsky - (3/3/2015 5:13 PM)
I am looking to buy a piezo unit. DoWell co. which you like has one for 6200 or something but Salvin and most other companies have them for 10-15000. I am a average surgeon who does a slight to moderate amount of this work, which do you recommend I get?
|
Maurice Salama - (3/3/2015 4:11 PM)
Dear Dr. Darko Veljanovski; The barrier membrane concept is not changing but has never been "clearly" described as to the timing of how long it is required. As to "barrier by bulk" that relies on thickness of material to slow down the migration of soft tissue to the regen site....also never proven. In my practice, a large critical size defect require more time with a barrier membrane and a small size defect may require less time and only PRGF or PRF fibrin membranes with bulk underneath. Thanks for your question and I hope this answer helps. regards Dr. Salama
|
mark hagigi - (2/28/2015 9:27 PM)
Great presentation by experts in this field. Just not if it was new, it seems speakers refer to 2010-2011?
|
Maurice Salama - (2/26/2015 8:22 AM)
Gentlemen; Sorry to hear about the issues watching the webinar yesterday. There was a weather issue in Atlanta that may have caused problems with the Global Server or it could be a slow local internet connection or both. We will check on that today. But this morning, I played the entire presentation and it played very well. We apologize about this inconvenience and value your comments. Hope you will attempt to watch again. sincerely Dr. Salama
|
Henry Ferguson - (2/25/2015 7:34 PM)
I paid to see he pikos salama webinar and there was no sound!!!!!!
|
Dr. Darko Veljanovski - (2/25/2015 2:47 PM)
Brilliant webinar. Great minds.
Dr. Pikos uses bone substitute as "veneer graft" to increase vestibular thickness in his second case. no membrane. I.think he said " biooss", as a slow resorbing material, is that correct? because bio oss is only spongious. Also, he advocates use of Mineross & ctg without any membrane and has evident results using that protocol. In addition , Dr. Anitua says only prf membrane ( lasting 3-4 weeks) is enough as barrier membrane, which is supposed to last much more than that.
My question is: is the barrier membrane concept changing.? Or is this the Misch's "barrier by bullk"?What is the scientific principle behind graft with no membrane concept?
Thank you.
|
Omid Moghaddas - (2/25/2015 12:20 PM)
Another perfect presentation by two of the bests, Mike and Mo
Thanks
|
Maurice Salama - (2/25/2015 9:26 AM)
Adosh; there have been some studies that have used PRF Fibrin alone with CPF for root coverage with some success. I prefer CTG as it allows for increased thickness, greater quantity of KT and more predictable root coverage than PRF alone. thanks Dr. Salama
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Partners in Synergy - The Webinar Event; Augmentation Strategies in Implant Dentistry
This course will highlight the current available regenerative techniques and protocols to maximize the esthetic results of tooth replacement therapy. Extraction site management, labial bone enhancement as well as current gingival augmentation techniques will be featured. These highly acclaimed clinicians and educators will team up to provide a glimpse of their upcoming LIVE Synergy VI conference June 11th - 14th, 2015 in Orlando, Florida.
| Presented By:: |
Maurice Salama, DMD |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical Bioengineering in the Management of the Atrophic Jaw
This lecture presentation will describe the behavior and utilization of of fresh frozen allograft vs. autogenous bone in major bone augmentation cases. The advantages and disadvantages as well as the potential of adding bone marrow aspirate to fresh frozen bone will be further highlighted. In depth review of how to manage and use this new technique in clinical practice will be clearly explained.
| Presented By:: |
Dr. Juan Alberto Fernandez Ruiz |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation: Optimizing Esthetic Results for the Restorative Dentist
Contemporary patient expectations have made esthetics a major requisite of all treatment plans, especially in situations where there is a high smile line. Although new restorative materials have highly improved predictability and esthetic outcomes, soft and hard tissue management play a fundamental role when working in esthetic areas. To achieve ideal esthetics, preservation of the natural soft and hard tissue architecture is a primary clinical objective. These new proposed techniques illustrate the importance of pre-prosthetic soft and hard tissue management when working in highly esthetic compromised areas.
| Presented By:: |
Giuseppe Cicero, DDS |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
The Modern Age of Regeneration: Tenting, Fixating and Space Creation
Regeneration requires a common biological thread for predictable results. Space Maintenance, Graft Stability, Bone Biologics, and Wound Management. This presentation will describe the importance of each critical step in regeneration and introduce a new technical system to assist the surgeon in managing and stabilizing the space required for optimal bone regeneration. Flap design, release, biologics selection and enhancement as well as bone stabilization, fixation, and secure membrane adaptation will be further highlighted as to it's critical value in the final results.
| Presented By:: |
Homa Zadeh, DDS, PhD |
| Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
| CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
A Novel Combined Surgical Approach to Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Titanium Mesh, Resorbable Membrane, and rhPDGF-BB: A Retrospective Consecutive Case Series
This report demonstrates the remarkable efficacy of guided bone regeneration using a combination of titanium mesh, resorbable collagen membrane, and rhPDGF for vertical ridge augmentation, thus expanding the indications for implant therapy and allowing recovery of the three-dimensional esthetic architecture in a severely absorbed alveolar ridge.
| Author(s): |
Akiyoshi Funato, D.D.S.;Tomohiro Ishikawa, DDS;Hajime Kitajima, DDS; Masahiro Yamada, DDS, PhD; Hidetada Moroi, DMD |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Modified IVAN Technique: Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation at Extraction for Delayed Implant Placement
Failure of a natural tooth may not permit placement of
an implant at the time of extraction due to insufficiency
in available bone to house the implant. Reconstruction
of the extraction socket frequently involves both hard
and soft tissue augmentation to provide a site that can house
the implant and ridge contours that mimic the adjacent natural
anatomy. This situation becomes more problematic in the
maxillary anterior due to the anatomy and the lower density of
the bone of the premaxilla.
The solution is the interpositional vascularized augmentation
neogenesis (IVAN), which consists of hard tissue grafts, various
barrier membranes, and closure with the pediculated connective
tissue graft (PCTG). The modified IVAN (mIVAN) technique
achieves the necessary goals and may be used in both delayed
and immediate placement situations.
| Author(s): |
Snježana Pohl, MD, DMD;Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
