Video Details
|
La Ciencia y Tecnología respaldando la Selección del Material de Injerto
Description:
Existe una gran variedad de materiales de injerto disponibles. Entender las indicaciones adecuadas y las limitaciones de ciertos materiales puede ser algo muy desafiante. El objetivo principal de este curso es proporcionar las directrices para la selección de los materiales adecuados a ser utilizados en indicaciones específicas para incrementar la previsibilidad de los tratamientos.
Date Added:
2/24/2014
Author(s):
Rodrigo Neiva, DDS, MS
Dr. Rodrigo Neiva currently heads the Department of Periodontics at Penn Dental Medicine as Chairman and Clinical Professor of Periodontics. After obtaining h...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / The Science and Technology Supporting Graft Material Selection
Questions & Comments
|
Rodrigo Neiva - (12/6/2014 11:22 AM)
Thanks Sang Shin, hope to see you in Las Vegas
|
Sang Shin - (12/5/2014 11:53 PM)
great foundational information.
|
Maurice Salama - (10/1/2014 6:28 PM)
Great stuff in an area that is very dynamic. What grafting materials to utilize is a huge issue. thanks Dr. Salama
|
yaser imam - (8/20/2014 8:19 PM)
very exciting presentation thank u
|
diogo silveira - (3/6/2014 7:15 AM)
very good revision!
|
Stefan Berger - (3/6/2014 4:45 AM)
Good review.
|
Rodrigo Neiva - (3/3/2014 10:59 PM)
Hector, Osbert, Nick, James, Andy, Felipe, Giuseppe, Henry and Hector; thank you for your kind and constructive comments. I'm glad that you all enjoyed this short presentation.
|
Rodrigo Neiva - (3/3/2014 10:57 PM)
Kenneth; excellent question. Alloderm (and Alloderm GBR) or other tissue-derived membranes (CopiOs, CopiOs Extend, Pericardium) are considered to be long-lasting absorbable membranes and very adequate for GBR techniques. They work better with mineralized allografts. They have many advantages over non-absorbable membranes (improved handling, less post-op complications). In terms of "barrier effect", they are your closest option to non-absorbable membranes.
|
Rodrigo Neiva - (3/3/2014 10:49 PM)
Maurice; the future is bright for Biologics. Osteoinduction and pro-angiogenic factors for sure are welcome but they still lack osteoconductivity, so they depend on a good scaffold or tenting device. We still need to find the ideal carrier to prevent the biologic material from being washed out too quickly or the carrier blocking osteoconduction. Once we find the perfect balance, the game will change for sure.
|
|
Related Videos |
|
|
|
|
GBR with Individualized Titanium Meshes
According to several authors, Guided bone regeneration is a procedure needed in half of the dental rehabilitations with dental implants. Due to this reality, digital dentistry become an important tool allowing us to be more precise and less invasive.
By printing customized titanium meshes based on the patients bone defects, we can now predict the exact volume needed to be regenerate and create a specific device that will help to maintain the space. This takes CAD CAM dentistry to the next level, allowing more predictability in every step of the way, from bone regeneration till prosthetic rehabilitation.
techniques more predictable.
The authors describe a new guided bone regeneration protocol based on the use of digital planning and fabrication of printed 3D titanium meshes, rigid devices that protect mechanically the scaffold, design over the patient CT scan.
Presented By:: |
Rui Coelho, DDS & Nuno Cruz, DDS, MSc |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Fresh Frozen Allograft Bone plus Bone Marrow Aspiration as a NEW Alternative to Autogenous Bone Augmentation - Part 2 of 2
This lecture presentation will describe the behaviour and utilization of of fresh frozen allograft vs. autogenous bone in major bone augmentation cases. The advantages and disadvantages as well as the potential of adding bone marrow aspirate to fresh frozen bone will be further highlighted. In depth review of how to manage and use this new technique in clinical practice will be clearly explained.
Presented By:: |
Dr. Juan Alberto Fernandez Ruiz |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Fibrin-Guided Bone Regeneration: Guidelines of a Simple, Predictable, & Low Risk Technique
This lecture is focused on an effective regenerative approach, but at low knowledge. The goal is to provide a new skill in favor of well-established techniques. The Fibrin Sealant (FS) is an additional clot of human origin. It has adhesive, sealant and inductive action stimulating hard and soft-tissue regeneration. The FS, mixed with bone chips and biomaterials, allows a better handling of the graft that, becoming plastic and moldable, adapts perfectly to bony defects without dispersion of granules. It’s effective also on wound protection achieving a faster healing of soft-tissue. This approach is excellent in the socket preservation and in the peri-implant regeneration on "closed" sites where the implants are inside the defects.
Presented By:: |
Vincenzo Foti, MD, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Retrospective Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: The Effect of Bone Grafting at Implant Placement
One method to measure the success of dental implant treatment is to evaluate marginal peri-implant bone-level changes and stability over time. The location of the fixture–abutment interface (FAI) can be of major importance when the goal is to construct esthetic restorations. In these situations the FAI is often placed in a more apical position to create an ideal emergence profile for the prosthetic construction. However, several animal studies have reported that placement of the FAI in a subcrestal position may result in peri-implant marginal bone loss. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of the implant for implants with reduced abutment diameters placed non-submerged and in subcrestal positions.
Author(s): |
Alan Fetner, DMD;Theofilos Koutouzis, DDS; Michael Fetner, DMD; Tord Lundgren, DDS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified IVAN Technique: Long-Term Follow-Up of 20 Cases Over 2 to 11 Years
When natural teeth fail, frequently there is a loss of hard and soft tissue. This may complicate subsequent dental implant placement by
creating insufficient bone to house the implant. This also occurs when the tooth has been missing for an extended period, especially in the
premaxilla, where the bone is less dense and often lacks sufficient volume of facial bone. Site reconstruction to accommodate implant
placement often requires both hard and soft tissue augmentation. The modified interpositional vascularized augmentation neogenesis
(mIVAN) technique achieves the desired treatment goals in both delayed and immediate placement scenarios. The technique will be
discussed as well as the long-term follow-up on 20 cases.
Author(s): |
Snježana Pohl, MD, DMD;Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|